Paper Trail Politics Election directory My Area

November 3, 2026 General Election · Election night returns

Napa County election results

31,446ballots counted36.4% of 86,446 registered voters
~30,546ballots left to countcounty estimate
56contests on the ballotwith semi-official returns

Turnout as ballots are counted

Same point in the count (6 days after Election Day):

  • 202636.4%so far
  • 202228.9%(60.9% final)
  • 202440.7%(78.2% final)
Nov 2022 generalNov 2024 generalNov 2026
0%20%40%60%80%Election Day+7 days+14 days+21 days+28 days2022: 60.9% final2024: 78.2% final2026: 36.4%0%20%40%60%80%Election Day+14 days+28 days2022 60.9%2024 78.2%2026 36.4%
Show the data
YearCounty reportHours after polls closedBallots countedTurnout
20222022-11-08 20:010.020,39024.43%
20222022-11-08 21:501.820,93025.07%
20222022-11-08 22:462.821,94326.29%
20222022-11-14 16:19140.323,91128.65%
20222022-11-15 16:48164.831,05437.20%
20222022-11-16 16:13188.238,28745.87%
20222022-11-17 16:32212.544,92353.82%
20222022-11-18 15:38235.748,52258.13%
20222022-12-02 09:26565.550,78860.85%
20242024-11-05 20:010.022,50426.43%
20242024-11-05 21:491.822,89126.88%
20242024-11-05 23:453.825,23129.63%
20242024-11-06 00:354.626,16030.72%
20242024-11-08 15:5267.929,25834.36%
20242024-11-12 16:22164.436,43042.78%
20242024-11-13 16:08188.143,06150.57%
20242024-11-14 16:19212.351,27060.21%
20242024-11-15 15:54235.958,44568.64%
20242024-11-18 13:21305.461,97772.79%
20242024-11-22 16:43404.766,31577.88%
20242024-11-25 13:17473.366,62278.24%
20242024-12-03 10:36662.666,63478.25%
20262026-11-03 20:010.016,83619.48%
20262026-11-03 21:551.917,19519.89%
20262026-11-03 23:463.818,07120.90%
20262026-11-04 01:465.819,30522.33%
20262026-11-05 16:1044.220,88424.16%
20262026-11-06 15:5567.924,35328.17%
20262026-11-09 17:01141.031,44636.38%

From the county’s results updates, timed from 8 p.m. on Election Day; earlier years are linear between updates.

D DemocraticR Republican* IncumbentLocal offices are nonpartisan.

Where available, statewide or districtwide totals from the California Secretary of State are shown first. Races that extend beyond this county offer “County only” for the county registrar’s count. Reports may update at different times.

Statewide offices 9

State propositions 14

  • California Proposition 1Yes/No questionProposition 1Ballot question

    AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR HOUSING AFFORDABILITY PROGRAMS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $11.25 billion in state general obligation bonds for housing affordability programs, including multifamily rental housing, mortgages for veterans, supportive housing, preservation of existing affordable housing, and downpayment assistance. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 25 years to repay the housing bond.

    A yes vote means

    The state could borrow $11.25 billion through general obligation bonds to support veterans and affordable housing programs.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes61.0%6,733,027
    2. NoNo39.0%4,296,574
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 2Yes/No questionProposition 2Ballot question

    INCREASES STATE’S RAINY DAY FUND. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Increases California's Rainy Day Fund, approved by voters in 2014, to provide funding for education, health care, public safety, and other essential services during economic downturns. Fiscal Impact: State budget reserves would be higher.

    A yes vote means

    State budget reserve rules would change so the Rainy Day Fund holds more money, and the state would make extra debt payments for longer.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes61.3%6,759,767
    2. NoNo38.7%4,260,447
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 3Yes/No questionProposition 3Ballot question

    PROVIDES PERMANENT FUNDING FOR SCHOOLS AND HEALTH CARE BY EXTENDING EXISTING TAX ON HIGH INCOMES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Makes permanent existing voter-approved tax rates for individuals earning over $371,000 (adjusted annually for inflation). Allocates tax revenues to public education. Fiscal Impact: Maintains $5 billion to $15 billion of annual state income tax revenue by making a temporary tax increase on high-income earners permanent instead of letting it expire in 2031.

    A yes vote means

    An income tax increase on high-income earners in place since 2012 would become permanent instead of expiring in 2031.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes60.6%6,733,849
    2. NoNo39.4%4,380,460
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 4Yes/No questionProposition 4Ballot question

    REPEALS PROHIBITION AGAINST PUBLIC FUNDING OF ELECTION CAMPAIGNS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Repeals prohibition on state and local governments offering public funding of candidate election campaigns. Public funding programs may not use funds earmarked for education, transportation, or public safety. Fiscal Impact: Ongoing costs to the state of a few hundred thousand dollars each year for the Fair Political Practices Commission to answer questions from state and local governments about public campaign finance programs.

    A yes vote means

    State and local governments could create public campaign financing programs for candidates, subject to limits on which public funds could be used and how.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo50.3%5,474,047
    2. YesYes49.7%5,406,205
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 5Yes/No questionProposition 5Ballot question

    CHANGES RECALL ELECTION PROCESS FOR STATEWIDE OFFICERS. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Under current law, voters elect replacement candidates at the same time as the recall election. This measure instead fills recall vacancies by subsequent special election or appointment. Fiscal Impact: Net fiscal effect unknown. In the event of a recall, savings or costs of millions of dollars to administer the election depending on the office recalled.

    A yes vote means

    Recall elections would no longer ask who should fill the vacancy; vacancies typically would be filled by special election or appointment.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes52.0%5,562,022
    2. NoNo48.0%5,134,433
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 37Yes/No questionProposition 37Ballot question

    CREATES LOAN PROGRAM FOR MIDDLE-INCOME BUYERS OF QUALIFIED NEW HOMES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $25 billion in bonds to offer eligible buyers fixed-rate mortgages for up to 17% of purchase price of a newly constructed home priced below about $1.5 million. Borrowers must be California residents, occupy the home, meet income limits, and pay at least 3% down. Bonds repaid by mortgage payments, not State. Fiscal Impact: No direct state or local costs.

    A yes vote means

    The state would create a homebuying assistance program funded by up to $25 billion in revenue bonds repaid by homeowners' loan payments.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes62.3%6,834,106
    2. NoNo37.7%4,132,590
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 38Yes/No questionProposition 38Ballot question

    AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR IMMUNOLOGY MEDICAL RESEARCH. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $8.4 billion in general obligation bonds for immunology and immunotherapy research, half to a single University of California-affiliated nonprofit medical research institute, half to research grants. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 20 years to repay the research bond, with some or all of the cost offset if the funded research generates revenue.

    A yes vote means

    The state could borrow $8.4 billion to support immunology and immunotherapy research by California research institutes and universities.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes54.2%5,963,079
    2. NoNo45.8%5,032,758
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 39Yes/No questionProposition 39Ballot question

    PROHIBITS CITIZENS FROM VOTING UNLESS THEY PRESENT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED IDENTIFICATION. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Invalidates mail ballots that do not have last four digits of designated government-issued identification number written on envelope. Prohibits in-person voting without presenting government-issued identification. Fiscal Impact: Costs of between tens of millions of dollars and low hundreds of millions of dollars each year to implement new voting requirements.

    A yes vote means

    Voters would be required to present additional identifying information, such as government-issued identification, to elections officials each time they vote.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo60.6%6,774,474
    2. YesYes39.4%4,407,227
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 40Yes/No questionProposition 40Ballot question

    IMPOSES ONE-TIME TAX ON CERTAIN TAXPAYERS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Imposes 5% tax on certain taxpayers with assets over $1 billion; revenue primarily for health care. Exempts revenues from constitutional requirements for school funding and spending limit. Fiscal Impact: Temporary revenue increase of tens of billions of dollars spread over several years from wealth tax on billionaires. Possible ongoing decrease of less than $1 billion per year in income tax revenue from billionaires.

    A yes vote means

    The state would collect a one-time tax from billionaires equal to 5 percent of their wealth.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo52.8%5,909,899
    2. YesYes47.2%5,288,424
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 41Yes/No questionProposition 41Ballot question

    PROHIBITS NEW STATE TAXES THAT EXCLUDE REVENUES FROM STATE SPENDING LIMIT. REQUIRES AUDITS FOR NEW STATE SPECIAL TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Nullifies state taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that exempt their revenues from voter-approved state spending limit. Requires pre-election and recurring audits of programs funded by new special taxes. Fiscal Impact: The net fiscal effect is unknown as it depends on future decisions by voters, the Legislature, and other policymakers.

    A yes vote means

    The State Auditor would review programs funded by new special taxes, and the state might not be able to exclude new special tax spending from its spending limit.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo54.9%6,035,499
    2. YesYes45.1%4,961,912
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 42Yes/No questionProposition 42Ballot question

    PROHIBITS NEW STATE PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES AND CERTAIN RETROACTIVE STATE TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Prohibits any new state tax (1) imposed on the ownership of personal property (all things people own other than real estate), or (2) that applies retroactively based on taxpayer’s past activities. Nullifies taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that conflict with this measure. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that tax revenues will not go up as much in the future.

    A yes vote means

    The state could not establish new taxes on the ownership of financial assets or other personal property.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes51.6%5,733,734
    2. NoNo48.4%5,371,123
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 43Yes/No questionProposition 43Ballot question

    LIMITS VOTERS’ ABILITY TO RAISE REVENUES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Limits voters’ ability to pass voter-proposed local special taxes by increasing percentage of votes needed to approve such ballot measures from a majority (over 50%) to two-thirds, beginning January 1, 2027. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that local government tax revenues will not go up as much in the future due to a higher vote threshold for certain taxes.

    A yes vote means

    Certain voter-proposed local special taxes would require two-thirds voter approval instead of a majority.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo57.3%6,257,179
    2. YesYes42.7%4,667,905
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 44Yes/No questionProposition 44Ballot question

    REQUIRES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS SPEND 90% OF REVENUE ON PROGRAM SERVICES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Imposes penalties on nonprofit Federally Qualified Health Centers (community clinics providing primary care to medically underserved areas and populations) that spend less than 90% of revenue on “program services” advancing their charitable purpose, including but not limited to patient services. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs in the low tens of millions of dollars per year, covered by fees.

    A yes vote means

    Certain private nonprofit health clinics would have to spend at least 90 percent of their revenue each year on providing health care services.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo82.1%8,946,122
    2. YesYes17.9%1,955,845
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 45Yes/No questionProposition 45Ballot question

    MODIFIES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Amends California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to expedite environmental review for certain projects (including most housing, transportation, water, and health projects) by setting deadlines to complete environmental review and resolve lawsuits challenging project approvals. Fiscal Impact: Initial costs for state and local governments, likely in the high tens of millions of dollars—potentially exceeding $100 million—annually, partly covered by fees. Uncertain, potentially more significant positive or negative longer-term fiscal effects.

    A yes vote means

    Certain public and private projects would be eligible for new environmental review and court challenge procedures with tighter time limits.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo56.1%6,103,353
    2. YesYes43.9%4,766,652
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State

Judicial retention 13

  • Retention of Associate Justice Charles A. Smiley, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1Yes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Charles A. Smiley, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1Ballot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Charles A. Smiley, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Charles A. Smiley, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes75.9%17,336
    2. NoNo24.1%5,495
    Napa County voters only147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Retention of Associate Justice Danny Y. Chou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5Yes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Danny Y. Chou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5Ballot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Danny Y. Chou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Danny Y. Chou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes75.9%16,981
    2. NoNo24.1%5,397
    Napa County voters only147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Retention of Associate Justice Gordon Burns, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5Yes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Gordon Burns, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5Ballot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Gordon Burns, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Gordon Burns, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes75.1%16,670
    2. NoNo24.9%5,525
    Napa County voters only147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Retention of Associate Justice Ioana Petrou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3Yes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Ioana Petrou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3Ballot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Ioana Petrou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Ioana Petrou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes75.4%16,995
    2. NoNo24.6%5,556
    Napa County voters only147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Retention of Associate Justice Joshua Groban, California Supreme CourtYes/No questionAssociate Justice Joshua GrobanBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Joshua Groban be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Joshua Groban on the California Supreme Court for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes71.5%6,320,411
    2. NoNo28.5%2,517,810
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • Retention of Associate Justice Kathleen M. Banke, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1Yes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Kathleen M. Banke, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1Ballot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Kathleen M. Banke, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Kathleen M. Banke, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes79.5%18,208
    2. NoNo20.5%4,684
    Napa County voters only147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Retention of Associate Justice Kelli M. Evans, California Supreme CourtYes/No questionAssociate Justice Kelli M. EvansBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Kelli M. Evans be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Kelli M. Evans on the California Supreme Court for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes72.5%6,401,321
    2. NoNo27.5%2,426,861
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • Retention of Associate Justice Mark Simons, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5Yes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Mark Simons, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5Ballot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Mark Simons, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Mark Simons, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes75.6%16,859
    2. NoNo24.4%5,449
    Napa County voters only147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Retention of Associate Justice Monique Langhorne Wilson, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1Yes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Monique Langhorne Wilson, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1Ballot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Monique Langhorne Wilson, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Monique Langhorne Wilson, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes78.7%18,926
    2. NoNo21.3%5,109
    Napa County voters only147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Retention of Associate Justice Tara M. Desautels, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2Yes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Tara M. Desautels, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2Ballot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Tara M. Desautels, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Tara M. Desautels, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes76.6%17,319
    2. NoNo23.4%5,294
    Napa County voters only147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Retention of Associate Justice Victor A. Rodriguez, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3Yes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Victor A. Rodriguez, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3Ballot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Victor A. Rodriguez, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Victor A. Rodriguez, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes76.2%17,175
    2. NoNo23.8%5,355
    Napa County voters only147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Retention of Presiding Justice Therese M. Stewart, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2Yes/No question
    Presiding Justice Retention of Presiding Justice Therese M. Stewart, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2Ballot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Presiding Justice Retention of Presiding Justice Therese M. Stewart, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Presiding Justice Therese M. Stewart, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes77.7%17,691
    2. NoNo22.3%5,067
    Napa County voters only147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Retention of Presiding Justice Tracie L. Brown, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4Yes/No question
    Presiding Justice Retention of Presiding Justice Tracie L. Brown, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4Ballot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Presiding Justice Retention of Presiding Justice Tracie L. Brown, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Presiding Justice Tracie L. Brown, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes78.6%17,767
    2. NoNo21.4%4,847
    Napa County voters only147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

U.S. House 1

  • U.S. Representative District 42 candidates
    1. MTMike ThompsonD60.2%17,617
    2. EJEric JonesD39.8%11,633
    Napa County voters only147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

State Legislature 1

City offices 7

American Canyon

  • City of American Canyon City Council Member5 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 5 win
    1. SBSindy Biederman30.2%1,320
    2. DODavid Oro25.9%1,131
    3. RCRobert Cole18.4%805
    4. JKJason Kishineff15.1%658
    5. JGJim Giron10.4%455
    Napa County count18 of 18 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

Napa

  • City of Napa City Council Member, District 11 candidate1 candidate for 1 seat
    1. CDChristopher Denatale100.0%4,221
    Napa County count20 of 20 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • City of Napa City Council Member, District 32 candidates
    1. MLMary Luros69.3%2,102
    2. JHJim Hinton30.7%932
    Napa County count22 of 22 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

St Helena

  • City of St Helena City Council Member5 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 5 win
    1. DHDaniel Hale30.0%779
    2. JPJoshua Parke27.6%716
    3. SDScott Diaz18.9%492
    4. KSKate Spadarotto16.6%431
    5. JPJohn Pedersen6.9%180
    Napa County count6 of 6 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • City of St Helena Mayor2 candidates
    1. BSBonnie Schoch70.1%1,097
    2. PKPatrick Kenealy29.9%468
    Napa County count6 of 6 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

Yountville

  • Town of Yountville Mayor2 candidates
    1. JTJoe Tagliaboschi51.0%449
    2. MMMarjorie Mohler49.0%432
    Napa County count4 of 4 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Town of Yountville Member, Town Council5 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 5 win
    1. HBHillery Bolt Trippe26.7%385
    2. RMRobin McKee26.1%377
    3. JTJill Turner20.4%295
    4. MCMatthew Chrzanowski19.8%286
    5. JBJessi Bugden5.8%83
    Napa County count4 of 4 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

City measures 3

American Canyon

  • Measure P – City of American Canyon, Sales TaxYes/No question
    Measure PBallot question

    American Canyon Public Safety, Parks, City Services Measure. Shall an ordinance funding American Canyon's general City services, such as maintaining 911 response/ neighborhood police patrols; preventing crime; reducing wildfire risk by managing brush/ other flammable vegetation; addressing speeding/ unsafe driving; keeping public areas/ parks safe/ clean; maintaining and expanding safe places for children to play; maintaining parks, trails, youth/ adult recreation, senior programming, among others; by establishing a 1% sales tax, providing approximately $3,700,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring audits, spending disclosure, funds locally controlled, be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote adopts a new 1% general sales tax in the City of American Canyon, raising about $3.7 million a year for general city services such as police patrols, wildfire brush clearance and parks, until repealed by voters.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Napa County Board of Supervisors resolution consolidating the Nov. 3, 2026 municipal elections ↗
    1. YesYes56.6%1,589
    2. NoNo43.4%1,218
    Napa County count18 of 18 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

St. Helena

  • Measure S – City of St. Helena, Sales TaxYes/No question
    Measure SBallot question

    St. Helena City Services Measure. To maintain/improve St. Helena's long-term finances and maintain 911 fire/public safety response, St. Helena's infrastructure including repairing roads/potholes/sidewalks; reducing local wildfire risk by managing brush/other fuels; maintain parks; supporting local businesses; for other general city services; shall the measure be adopted establishing a ½¢ locally controlled sales tax, generating approximately $2,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring independent audits, public spending disclosure, all funds benefiting St. Helena residents?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote adopts a new one-half cent general sales tax in the City of St. Helena, raising about $2 million a year for general city services such as fire and public safety, road repair, wildfire fuel reduction and parks, until repealed by voters.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: City of St. Helena, Measure S – Ballot Question ↗
    1. YesYes56.1%900
    2. NoNo43.9%703
    Napa County count6 of 6 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

Yountville

  • Measure Y – Town of Yountville, Spending Limit IncreaseYes/No question
    Measure YBallot question

    To fully utilize TOT and sales tax generated from visitors for public services, parks and recreation, police, and fire emergency programs, shall the appropriations limit set by Article 13B of the California Constitution be increased by $3,000,000 plus 1/4 of TOT revenues for the prior fiscal year, for each year for a four year period commencing FY 2027/2028? By approving this appropriation limit, no existing tax is increased and no new taxes are created.

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote raises the Town of Yountville's state appropriations (Gann) limit by $3 million plus one-quarter of the prior year's hotel-tax (TOT) revenue each year for four years starting FY 2027/28, so the Town can spend visitor-generated tax revenue; it creates no new tax and raises no tax rate.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Town of Yountville Resolution No. 26-4427 ↗
    1. YesYes81.9%737
    2. NoNo18.1%163
    Napa County count4 of 4 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

School and college boards 7

Calistoga Joint Unified School District

  • Calistoga Joint Unified School District Governing Board Member4 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 4 win
    1. LRLaurel Rios32.2%766
    2. IPIrene Pena26.0%619
    3. CRCecilia Ramirez21.9%521
    4. RSRebecca Sager19.9%472
    Napa County count7 of 7 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

Napa Valley College

  • Napa Valley College Trustee Area No. 22 candidates
    1. JDJeff Dodd63.4%1,644
    2. HRHeriverto Ruiz36.6%949
    Napa County count16 of 16 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Napa Valley College Trustee Area No. 33 candidatesTop 1 of 3 wins
    1. EPEmily Pastula37.3%825
    2. ELElizabeth L Goff34.2%755
    3. KSKarina Servente28.5%630
    Napa County count17 of 17 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Napa Valley College Trustee Area No. 42 candidates
    1. WIWilliam "Kyle" Iverson52.5%2,051
    2. CJCindy Johnson47.5%1,856
    Napa County count27 of 27 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

Napa Valley Unified School District

  • Napa Valley Unified School District Trustee Area No. 12 candidates
    1. RJRobin Jankiewicz64.5%3,117
    2. MMMatthew McMann35.5%1,713
    Napa County count25 of 25 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Napa Valley Unified School District Trustee Area No. 62 candidates
    1. EGElba Gonzalez-Mares62.0%2,061
    2. TNTyrone Navarro38.0%1,264
    Napa County count18 of 18 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division
  • Napa Valley Unified School District Trustee Area No. 74 candidatesTop 1 of 4 wins
    1. DHDavid Hildebrandt42.5%1,501
    2. JMJason M. Dooley31.2%1,101
    3. JHJohn Houser18.1%641
    4. GCGabriel Champagne8.2%290
    Napa County count18 of 18 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

County, school and district measures 1

  • Measure B – County of Napa, Wildfire and Open Space Sales Tax (Initiative)Yes/No question
    Measure BBallot question

    To reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfires; remove dry brush, dead trees, and fire hazards; establish firebreaks and fire-safe evacuation routes for residents and first responders; preserve natural open spaces, and protect water quality/supplies and land around lakes, rivers, and streams; shall Napa County's one-half cent sales tax measure be adopted, providing $23,000,000 annually for 18 years, with oversight, annual audits and local control?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote adopts a citizen initiative imposing a countywide one-half cent sales tax from April 1, 2027 to March 31, 2045 (about $23 million a year), split equally between Napa County and the Napa County Regional Park and Open Space District for wildfire preparedness, watershed protection and open space, with an oversight committee.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Napa County Board of Supervisors resolution calling the Measure B special election ↗
    1. YesYes63.4%19,076
    2. NoNo36.6%11,000
    Napa County count147 of 147 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 5:01 p.m. PTSource: Napa County Election Division

About this information

County results come from the Napa County Election Division. Statewide and districtwide totals come from the California Secretary of State. See the source links on each result; counts are semi-official and will change until certification, and no winners are called here.