Paper Trail Politics Election directory My Area

November 3, 2026 General Election · Election night returns

Sacramento County election results

508,097ballots counted55.2% of 920,998 registered voters
~241,111ballots left to countcounty estimate
113contests on the ballotwith semi-official returns

Turnout as ballots are counted

Same point in the count (7 days after Election Day):

  • 202655.2%so far
  • 202230.0%(56.0% final)
  • 202455.9%(75.2% final)
Nov 2022 generalNov 2024 generalNov 2026
0%20%40%60%80%Election Day+7 days+14 days+21 days+28 days2022: 56.0% final2024: 75.2% final2026: 55.2%0%20%40%60%80%Election Day+14 days+28 days2022 56.0%2024 75.2%2026 55.2%
Show the data
YearCounty reportHours after polls closedBallots countedTurnout
20222022-11-08 20:020.0128,17314.82%
20222022-11-08 21:582.0135,10815.62%
20222022-11-09 00:004.0145,01516.77%
20222022-11-11 14:5666.9211,63924.47%
20222022-11-15 14:48162.8258,26629.86%
20222022-11-18 15:03235.1345,83739.99%
20222022-11-22 14:50330.9400,51146.31%
20222022-11-29 14:57499.0472,95154.69%
20222022-12-02 15:08571.1482,42455.78%
20222022-12-06 14:41666.7484,31556.00%
20222022-12-07 14:44690.7484,31556.00%
20242024-11-05 20:010.0278,87131.35%
20242024-11-05 21:541.9289,48032.55%
20242024-11-05 23:594.0299,48533.67%
20242024-11-06 01:565.9311,82135.06%
20242024-11-08 15:5768.0411,80946.30%
20242024-11-12 16:40164.7497,79955.97%
20242024-11-15 16:14236.2611,60768.76%
20242024-11-19 16:17332.3645,83472.61%
20242024-11-22 16:09404.1651,80873.28%
20242024-11-26 15:45499.8659,67974.17%
20242024-12-02 15:00643.0668,40275.15%
20242024-12-03 15:33667.6668,41675.15%
20262026-11-03 20:010.0243,03626.39%
20262026-11-03 21:541.9253,19627.49%
20262026-11-03 23:543.9262,95228.55%
20262026-11-04 01:255.4271,40629.47%
20262026-11-06 15:5467.9359,99439.09%
20262026-11-10 15:35163.6508,09755.17%

From the county’s results updates, timed from 8 p.m. on Election Day; earlier years are linear between updates.

D DemocraticR Republican* IncumbentLocal offices are nonpartisan.

Where available, statewide or districtwide totals from the California Secretary of State are shown first. Races that extend beyond this county offer “County only” for the county registrar’s count. Reports may update at different times.

Statewide offices 9

State propositions 14

  • California Proposition 1Yes/No questionProposition 1Ballot question

    AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR HOUSING AFFORDABILITY PROGRAMS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $11.25 billion in state general obligation bonds for housing affordability programs, including multifamily rental housing, mortgages for veterans, supportive housing, preservation of existing affordable housing, and downpayment assistance. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 25 years to repay the housing bond.

    A yes vote means

    The state could borrow $11.25 billion through general obligation bonds to support veterans and affordable housing programs.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes61.1%7,310,455
    2. NoNo38.9%4,663,551
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 2Yes/No questionProposition 2Ballot question

    INCREASES STATE’S RAINY DAY FUND. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Increases California's Rainy Day Fund, approved by voters in 2014, to provide funding for education, health care, public safety, and other essential services during economic downturns. Fiscal Impact: State budget reserves would be higher.

    A yes vote means

    State budget reserve rules would change so the Rainy Day Fund holds more money, and the state would make extra debt payments for longer.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes61.3%7,331,507
    2. NoNo38.7%4,632,231
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 3Yes/No questionProposition 3Ballot question

    PROVIDES PERMANENT FUNDING FOR SCHOOLS AND HEALTH CARE BY EXTENDING EXISTING TAX ON HIGH INCOMES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Makes permanent existing voter-approved tax rates for individuals earning over $371,000 (adjusted annually for inflation). Allocates tax revenues to public education. Fiscal Impact: Maintains $5 billion to $15 billion of annual state income tax revenue by making a temporary tax increase on high-income earners permanent instead of letting it expire in 2031.

    A yes vote means

    An income tax increase on high-income earners in place since 2012 would become permanent instead of expiring in 2031.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes60.7%7,325,303
    2. NoNo39.3%4,746,890
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 4Yes/No questionProposition 4Ballot question

    REPEALS PROHIBITION AGAINST PUBLIC FUNDING OF ELECTION CAMPAIGNS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Repeals prohibition on state and local governments offering public funding of candidate election campaigns. Public funding programs may not use funds earmarked for education, transportation, or public safety. Fiscal Impact: Ongoing costs to the state of a few hundred thousand dollars each year for the Fair Political Practices Commission to answer questions from state and local governments about public campaign finance programs.

    A yes vote means

    State and local governments could create public campaign financing programs for candidates, subject to limits on which public funds could be used and how.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo50.3%5,943,929
    2. YesYes49.7%5,872,250
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 5Yes/No questionProposition 5Ballot question

    CHANGES RECALL ELECTION PROCESS FOR STATEWIDE OFFICERS. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Under current law, voters elect replacement candidates at the same time as the recall election. This measure instead fills recall vacancies by subsequent special election or appointment. Fiscal Impact: Net fiscal effect unknown. In the event of a recall, savings or costs of millions of dollars to administer the election depending on the office recalled.

    A yes vote means

    Recall elections would no longer ask who should fill the vacancy; vacancies typically would be filled by special election or appointment.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes51.9%6,030,402
    2. NoNo48.1%5,585,459
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 37Yes/No questionProposition 37Ballot question

    CREATES LOAN PROGRAM FOR MIDDLE-INCOME BUYERS OF QUALIFIED NEW HOMES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $25 billion in bonds to offer eligible buyers fixed-rate mortgages for up to 17% of purchase price of a newly constructed home priced below about $1.5 million. Borrowers must be California residents, occupy the home, meet income limits, and pay at least 3% down. Bonds repaid by mortgage payments, not State. Fiscal Impact: No direct state or local costs.

    A yes vote means

    The state would create a homebuying assistance program funded by up to $25 billion in revenue bonds repaid by homeowners' loan payments.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes62.4%7,431,832
    2. NoNo37.6%4,478,694
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 38Yes/No questionProposition 38Ballot question

    AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR IMMUNOLOGY MEDICAL RESEARCH. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $8.4 billion in general obligation bonds for immunology and immunotherapy research, half to a single University of California-affiliated nonprofit medical research institute, half to research grants. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 20 years to repay the research bond, with some or all of the cost offset if the funded research generates revenue.

    A yes vote means

    The state could borrow $8.4 billion to support immunology and immunotherapy research by California research institutes and universities.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes54.0%6,449,704
    2. NoNo46.0%5,489,522
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 39Yes/No questionProposition 39Ballot question

    PROHIBITS CITIZENS FROM VOTING UNLESS THEY PRESENT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED IDENTIFICATION. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Invalidates mail ballots that do not have last four digits of designated government-issued identification number written on envelope. Prohibits in-person voting without presenting government-issued identification. Fiscal Impact: Costs of between tens of millions of dollars and low hundreds of millions of dollars each year to implement new voting requirements.

    A yes vote means

    Voters would be required to present additional identifying information, such as government-issued identification, to elections officials each time they vote.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo60.6%7,356,027
    2. YesYes39.4%4,789,934
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 40Yes/No questionProposition 40Ballot question

    IMPOSES ONE-TIME TAX ON CERTAIN TAXPAYERS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Imposes 5% tax on certain taxpayers with assets over $1 billion; revenue primarily for health care. Exempts revenues from constitutional requirements for school funding and spending limit. Fiscal Impact: Temporary revenue increase of tens of billions of dollars spread over several years from wealth tax on billionaires. Possible ongoing decrease of less than $1 billion per year in income tax revenue from billionaires.

    A yes vote means

    The state would collect a one-time tax from billionaires equal to 5 percent of their wealth.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo52.5%6,379,810
    2. YesYes47.5%5,782,729
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 41Yes/No questionProposition 41Ballot question

    PROHIBITS NEW STATE TAXES THAT EXCLUDE REVENUES FROM STATE SPENDING LIMIT. REQUIRES AUDITS FOR NEW STATE SPECIAL TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Nullifies state taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that exempt their revenues from voter-approved state spending limit. Requires pre-election and recurring audits of programs funded by new special taxes. Fiscal Impact: The net fiscal effect is unknown as it depends on future decisions by voters, the Legislature, and other policymakers.

    A yes vote means

    The State Auditor would review programs funded by new special taxes, and the state might not be able to exclude new special tax spending from its spending limit.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo55.1%6,575,557
    2. YesYes44.9%5,365,971
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 42Yes/No questionProposition 42Ballot question

    PROHIBITS NEW STATE PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES AND CERTAIN RETROACTIVE STATE TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Prohibits any new state tax (1) imposed on the ownership of personal property (all things people own other than real estate), or (2) that applies retroactively based on taxpayer’s past activities. Nullifies taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that conflict with this measure. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that tax revenues will not go up as much in the future.

    A yes vote means

    The state could not establish new taxes on the ownership of financial assets or other personal property.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes51.4%6,197,982
    2. NoNo48.6%5,860,395
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 43Yes/No questionProposition 43Ballot question

    LIMITS VOTERS’ ABILITY TO RAISE REVENUES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Limits voters’ ability to pass voter-proposed local special taxes by increasing percentage of votes needed to approve such ballot measures from a majority (over 50%) to two-thirds, beginning January 1, 2027. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that local government tax revenues will not go up as much in the future due to a higher vote threshold for certain taxes.

    A yes vote means

    Certain voter-proposed local special taxes would require two-thirds voter approval instead of a majority.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo57.4%6,804,870
    2. YesYes42.6%5,042,901
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 44Yes/No questionProposition 44Ballot question

    REQUIRES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS SPEND 90% OF REVENUE ON PROGRAM SERVICES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Imposes penalties on nonprofit Federally Qualified Health Centers (community clinics providing primary care to medically underserved areas and populations) that spend less than 90% of revenue on “program services” advancing their charitable purpose, including but not limited to patient services. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs in the low tens of millions of dollars per year, covered by fees.

    A yes vote means

    Certain private nonprofit health clinics would have to spend at least 90 percent of their revenue each year on providing health care services.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo82.1%9,713,528
    2. YesYes17.9%2,121,976
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 45Yes/No questionProposition 45Ballot question

    MODIFIES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Amends California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to expedite environmental review for certain projects (including most housing, transportation, water, and health projects) by setting deadlines to complete environmental review and resolve lawsuits challenging project approvals. Fiscal Impact: Initial costs for state and local governments, likely in the high tens of millions of dollars—potentially exceeding $100 million—annually, partly covered by fees. Uncertain, potentially more significant positive or negative longer-term fiscal effects.

    A yes vote means

    Certain public and private projects would be eligible for new environmental review and court challenge procedures with tighter time limits.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo56.3%6,646,965
    2. YesYes43.7%5,154,160
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State

Judicial retention 9

  • Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes70.7%253,819
    2. NoNo29.3%105,362
    Sacramento County voters onlyUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes68.1%245,649
    2. NoNo31.9%115,288
    Sacramento County voters onlyUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes70.7%253,602
    2. NoNo29.3%105,229
    Sacramento County voters onlyUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Retention of Associate Justice Joshua Groban, California Supreme CourtYes/No questionAssociate Justice Joshua GrobanBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Joshua Groban be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Joshua Groban on the California Supreme Court for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes71.4%6,844,523
    2. NoNo28.6%2,738,260
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • Retention of Associate Justice Kelli M. Evans, California Supreme CourtYes/No questionAssociate Justice Kelli M. EvansBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Kelli M. Evans be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Kelli M. Evans on the California Supreme Court for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes72.4%6,931,908
    2. NoNo27.6%2,642,432
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes71.8%262,724
    2. NoNo28.2%103,147
    Sacramento County voters onlyUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes68.6%246,294
    2. NoNo31.4%112,771
    Sacramento County voters onlyUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes72.5%262,261
    2. NoNo27.5%99,504
    Sacramento County voters onlyUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Retention of Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Presiding Justice Retention of Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Presiding Justice Retention of Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes74.1%283,266
    2. NoNo25.9%99,109
    Sacramento County voters onlyUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

U.S. House 5

State Legislature 7

County and Superior Court 1

City offices 12

Citrus Heights

Elk Grove

Folsom

Galt

Rancho Cordova

City measures 4

Folsom

Galt

School and college boards 22

Arcohe Union School District

  • Arcohe Union School District Governing Board Member (3)6 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 6 win
    1. GSGarrett Sparks22.0%721
    2. MEMonica E. Petersen20.2%662
    3. TMTrevor Messersmith18.3%598
    4. BFBobbie F. Stepps16.5%540
    5. MOMichael Ostrom12.4%407
    6. MDMike Dieter10.6%346
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

Center Joint Unified School District

Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District

Elk Grove Unified School District

Folsom Cordova Unified School District

Galt Joint Union Elementary School District

Galt Joint Union High School District

Los Rios Community College District

  • Los Rios Community College District Trustee Area 13 candidatesTop 1 of 3 wins
    1. DGDevon Graves46.4%22,666
    2. DCD'andrea Chapman31.5%15,381
    3. MTMagdalena T. Gonzalez22.1%10,784
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Los Rios Community College District Trustee Area 28 candidatesTop 1 of 8 wins
    1. OLOranit Limmaneeprasert22.7%14,893
    2. PDPhil Davis19.7%12,934
    3. PVPaula Villescaz19.3%12,665
    4. MGMark Gregg18.4%12,075
    5. MRMartin Ross7.5%4,901
    6. TLTim Loree7.1%4,676
    7. SCSukdip "Steve" Chima2.9%1,928
    8. JBJonathan Brownell2.5%1,649
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Los Rios Community College District Trustee Area 65 candidatesTop 1 of 5 wins
    1. DVDeborah V. Ortiz48.3%29,831
    2. ZCZima Creason26.4%16,308
    3. PKPearl Koven10.7%6,630
    4. WTWilliam Thomas Bernal8.8%5,425
    5. KEKeith Ellis5.7%3,515
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

Natomas Unified School District

River Delta Unified School District

Robla School District

  • Robla School District Governing Board Member (3)4 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 4 win
    1. RHRaynell Hamilton-Starks28.0%1,575
    2. JEJorge E. Mendoza Gonzalez27.9%1,565
    3. SOSabrina Oliver24.2%1,359
    4. CJCraig J. Deluz19.9%1,120
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

San Joaquin Delta Community College District

San Juan Unified School District

Sierra Joint Community College District

Special districts 25

American River Flood Control District

Carmichael Water District

Cordova Recreation and Park District

Fair Oaks Recreation and Park District

Fair Oaks Water District

Florin County Water District

Florin Resource Conservation District

  • Florin Resource Conservation District Director (3)4 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 4 win
    1. PLPaul Lindsay28.9%35,709
    2. JMJohn Moua24.9%30,788
    3. BBBret Bartholomew24.7%30,623
    4. KAKimberly A. Martin21.5%26,663
    5. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%3
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

Fulton-El Camino Recreation and Park District

  • Fulton-El Camino Recreation and Park District Director (2)4 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 4 win
    1. MSMichael Seaman48.4%3,895
    2. GKGabriella Khan18.7%1,506
    3. SHShafiullah Hotak17.8%1,436
    4. STSteven T. Rice15.1%1,218
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

North Highlands Recreation and Park District

  • North Highlands Recreation and Park District Director (2)3 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 3 win
    1. PBPatrick B Williams40.5%4,152
    2. JMJoanna McVay38.3%3,927
    3. SCSukdip "Steve" Chima21.1%2,165
    4. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%2
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

Rancho Murieta Community Services District

  • Rancho Murieta Community Services District Director (3)8 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 8 win
    1. TSTom Shewchuk18.9%1,501
    2. CSCatherine Silvera15.8%1,254
    3. MCMaria Caudill15.7%1,246
    4. JBJeffrey Berkheimer13.4%1,065
    5. WGWilliam Gere12.5%991
    6. SBStephen Booth12.4%985
    7. PWPeter W. Reagan8.1%644
    8. TDTim Dec3.0%241
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Rancho Murieta Community Services District Director – Short Term (1)2 candidates
    1. MMMichael Martel51.2%1,474
    2. JVJohn Van Doren48.8%1,402
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

Rio Linda / Elverta Community Water District

  • Rio Linda / Elverta Community Water District Director (2)4 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 4 win
    1. JBJennifer Boddie35.8%1,948
    2. JMJoshua Macculloch33.3%1,813
    3. VAVicky A. Young22.3%1,212
    4. NMNevaeh Moore8.7%471
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

Sacramento Municipal Utility District

Sacramento Suburban Water District

  • Sacramento Suburban Water District Director, Division 1 – Short Term4 candidatesTop 1 of 4 wins
    1. ACAndrew Consiglio47.4%3,392
    2. NGNaomi Goudeaux26.6%1,905
    3. BDBrian Dyer17.9%1,280
    4. JLJohnnie L. Hall8.1%583
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Sacramento Suburban Water District Director, Division 33 candidatesTop 1 of 3 wins
    1. RPRobert P. "Bob" Wichert61.8%4,093
    2. ASAndrew Saunders27.2%1,802
    3. DDDavid D. Franco11.1%732
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Sacramento Suburban Water District Director, Division 45 candidatesTop 1 of 5 wins
    1. EWEdward Winkler45.8%4,114
    2. RJRobert J. Matteoli24.3%2,181
    3. CCCorey Carskaddon13.0%1,172
    4. FGFernando Gonzalez9.3%836
    5. GMGlenn Mueller7.6%683
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Sacramento Suburban Water District Director, Division 52 candidates
    1. CLCraig Locke73.6%7,867
    2. KPKen Payne26.4%2,823
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

San Juan Water District

Southgate Recreation and Park District

Wilton Fire Protection District

  • Wilton Fire Protection District Director (2)6 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 6 win
    1. RFRon Fiorica29.6%1,303
    2. AJAlexander J Carl24.6%1,086
    3. MCMark Creager20.8%918
    4. CWCarlos William Rogers10.9%481
    5. TETim Erik Radulovich8.3%365
    6. MJMike J. Katen5.8%255
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

County, school and district measures 5

  • Measure D – Natomas Unified School District, BondYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure DBallot question

    Natomas Schools Repair, Safety, Education Measure. To continue providing quality education/career training; repair aging infrastructure/electrical systems/classrooms/leaky roofs; improve school safety/security/access for students with disabilities/safe play areas, by repairing, constructing, acquiring classrooms/facilities, shall Natomas Unified School District's measure authorizing $300,000,000 in bonds at legal rates; levying $60 per $100,000 of assessed valuation; raising approximately $22,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding; requiring oversight, disclosure, audits, no money for administrators' salaries, be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Natomas Unified School District to issue $300 million in bonds, levying $60 per $100,000 of assessed value (about $22 million annually), to repair, build and acquire school facilities.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections, Current Measure Information – November 3, 2026 General Election ↗
    1. YesYes73.0%18,310
    2. NoNo27.1%6,789
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Measure E – Center Joint Unified School District, General Obligation BondsYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure EBallot question

    To upgrade local schools; improve school and student safety; replace leaky roofs and decaying pipes; replace failing heating and cooling systems; and update hands-on science and early job training classrooms and accommodate growing enrollment, shall Center Joint Unified School District’s measure authorizing $197 million in bonds, at legal rates, levying approximately $60 per $100,000 assessed value, (averaging $12,300,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, with citizen oversight and audits, all funds staying local and none for administrator salaries, be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Center Joint Unified School District to issue $197 million in bonds, levying about $60 per $100,000 of assessed value (averaging $12.3 million annually), to repair and upgrade schools and accommodate enrollment growth.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections, Current Measure Information – November 3, 2026 General Election ↗
    1. YesYes67.3%4,628
    2. NoNo32.6%2,244
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Measure G – Galt Joint Union High School District, Obligation BondYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure GBallot question

    Galt Joint Union High School District, Repair/Safety and Vocational Training Measure. To upgrade classrooms to maintain quality education/school safety by preparing students for skilled trades including welding/construction/plumbing; repairing leaky roofs; removing asbestos/mold; shall Galt Joint Union High School District’s measure be adopted, authorizing $43,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying $30 per $100,000 of assessed valuation, generating $3,100,000 annually, while bonds are outstanding, prohibiting funds for administrators salaries/pensions, requiring independent citizens’ oversight, audits, all funds locally controlled?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Galt Joint Union High School District to issue $43 million in bonds, levied at about $30 per $100,000 of assessed value (about $3.1 million annually), to repair and upgrade high school facilities, including vocational training space.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections, Current Measure Information – November 3, 2026 General Election ↗
    1. YesYes55.0%5,816
    2. NoNo45.0%4,755
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Measure H – Los Rios Community College District, School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 BondYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure HBallot question

    With funds that cannot be taken by the State, public disclosure of all spending, and no increase in tax rates, shall Los Rios Community College District's measure to prepare students, workers, veterans for jobs with affordable college and career training facilities; provide safe drinking water; and repair leaky roofs be adopted authorizing $1.1 billion in bonds with legal rates, average levies below $17 per $100,000 assessed valuation ($74,500,000 annually while outstanding), independent audits, oversight, and all funds staying local?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Los Rios Community College District's School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 to issue $1.1 billion in bonds, with average levies below $17 per $100,000 of assessed value (about $74.5 million annually), for college job-training facilities, safe drinking water and roof repairs.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections, Current Measure Information – November 3, 2026 General Election ↗
    1. YesYes63.4%266,280
    2. NoNo36.6%153,927
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections
  • Measure M – Sacramento City Unified School District, Parcel TaxYes/No questionNeeds two-thirds to pass
    Measure MBallot question

    To address the decline in Federal funding for Special Education and to expand early intervention programs to every school, shall Sacramento City Unified School District adopt a $95 per year Special Education tax on each parcel of property until repealed or replaced by voters, raising $10 million annually, with exemptions for seniors, including Social Security recipients, and recipients of Supplemental Security and Social Security Disability and annual inflation adjustments, providing funds exclusively for Special Education and intervention programs, be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote enacts a $95-per-year parcel tax in Sacramento City Unified School District, starting July 1, 2027 and continuing until changed by voters (about $10 million annually, adjusted for inflation up to 3% a year), for special education and early intervention, with exemptions for eligible seniors and disability recipients.

    Needed to pass

    Two-thirds

    Source: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections, Current Measure Information – November 3, 2026 General Election ↗
    1. YesYes53.5%53,415
    2. NoNo46.5%46,342
    Sacramento County countUpdated November 10, 2026, 3:35 p.m. PTSource: Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections

About this information

County results come from the Sacramento County Voter Registration and Elections. Statewide and districtwide totals come from the California Secretary of State. See the source links on each result; counts are semi-official and will change until certification, and no winners are called here.