San Francisco County election results

Statewide offices 9

• California Governor2 candidates
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. Xavier BecerraD65.7%8,087,056
  2. Steve HiltonR34.3%4,226,022

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Lieutenant Governor2 candidates
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. Fiona MaD65.6%7,963,888
  2. Gloria RomeroR34.4%4,178,402

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Secretary of State2 candidates
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. Shirley N. Weber* incumbentD66.6%8,074,043
  2. Donald P. (Don) WagnerR33.4%4,052,550

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Controller2 candidates
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. Malia M. Cohen* incumbentD65.6%7,911,701
  2. Herb W MorganR34.4%4,151,904

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Treasurer2 candidates
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. Eleni KounalakisD65.7%7,927,716
  2. Jennifer HawksR34.3%4,130,396

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Attorney General2 candidates
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. Rob Bonta* incumbentD65.5%7,939,860
  2. Michael E. GatesR34.5%4,175,881

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Insurance Commissioner2 candidates
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. Jane KimD54.1%5,709,598
  2. Ben AllenD45.9%4,848,798

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• Board of Equalization Member, District 22 candidates
  1. Sally J. Lieber60.1%172,883
  2. John Pimentel39.9%114,854
  San Francisco County voters only514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• California Superintendent of Public Instruction2 candidates
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. Richard Barrera59.1%6,155,726
  2. Sonja Shaw40.9%4,265,172

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State

State propositions 14

• California Proposition 1Yes/No questioniProposition 1Ballot question

  AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR HOUSING AFFORDABILITY PROGRAMS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $11.25 billion in state general obligation bonds for housing affordability programs, including multifamily rental housing, mortgages for veterans, supportive housing, preservation of existing affordable housing, and downpayment assistance. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 25 years to repay the housing bond.

  A yes vote means

  The state could borrow $11.25 billion through general obligation bonds to support veterans and affordable housing programs.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. YesYes61.1%7,310,455
  2. NoNo38.9%4,663,551

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 2Yes/No questioniProposition 2Ballot question

  INCREASES STATE’S RAINY DAY FUND. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Increases California's Rainy Day Fund, approved by voters in 2014, to provide funding for education, health care, public safety, and other essential services during economic downturns. Fiscal Impact: State budget reserves would be higher.

  A yes vote means

  State budget reserve rules would change so the Rainy Day Fund holds more money, and the state would make extra debt payments for longer.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. YesYes61.3%7,331,507
  2. NoNo38.7%4,632,231

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 3Yes/No questioniProposition 3Ballot question

  PROVIDES PERMANENT FUNDING FOR SCHOOLS AND HEALTH CARE BY EXTENDING EXISTING TAX ON HIGH INCOMES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Makes permanent existing voter-approved tax rates for individuals earning over $371,000 (adjusted annually for inflation). Allocates tax revenues to public education. Fiscal Impact: Maintains $5 billion to $15 billion of annual state income tax revenue by making a temporary tax increase on high-income earners permanent instead of letting it expire in 2031.

  A yes vote means

  An income tax increase on high-income earners in place since 2012 would become permanent instead of expiring in 2031.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. YesYes60.7%7,325,303
  2. NoNo39.3%4,746,890

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 4Yes/No questioniProposition 4Ballot question

  REPEALS PROHIBITION AGAINST PUBLIC FUNDING OF ELECTION CAMPAIGNS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Repeals prohibition on state and local governments offering public funding of candidate election campaigns. Public funding programs may not use funds earmarked for education, transportation, or public safety. Fiscal Impact: Ongoing costs to the state of a few hundred thousand dollars each year for the Fair Political Practices Commission to answer questions from state and local governments about public campaign finance programs.

  A yes vote means

  State and local governments could create public campaign financing programs for candidates, subject to limits on which public funds could be used and how.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. NoNo50.3%5,943,929
  2. YesYes49.7%5,872,250

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 5Yes/No questioniProposition 5Ballot question

  CHANGES RECALL ELECTION PROCESS FOR STATEWIDE OFFICERS. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Under current law, voters elect replacement candidates at the same time as the recall election. This measure instead fills recall vacancies by subsequent special election or appointment. Fiscal Impact: Net fiscal effect unknown. In the event of a recall, savings or costs of millions of dollars to administer the election depending on the office recalled.

  A yes vote means

  Recall elections would no longer ask who should fill the vacancy; vacancies typically would be filled by special election or appointment.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. YesYes51.9%6,030,402
  2. NoNo48.1%5,585,459

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 37Yes/No questioniProposition 37Ballot question

  CREATES LOAN PROGRAM FOR MIDDLE-INCOME BUYERS OF QUALIFIED NEW HOMES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $25 billion in bonds to offer eligible buyers fixed-rate mortgages for up to 17% of purchase price of a newly constructed home priced below about $1.5 million. Borrowers must be California residents, occupy the home, meet income limits, and pay at least 3% down. Bonds repaid by mortgage payments, not State. Fiscal Impact: No direct state or local costs.

  A yes vote means

  The state would create a homebuying assistance program funded by up to $25 billion in revenue bonds repaid by homeowners' loan payments.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. YesYes62.4%7,431,832
  2. NoNo37.6%4,478,694

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 38Yes/No questioniProposition 38Ballot question

  AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR IMMUNOLOGY MEDICAL RESEARCH. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $8.4 billion in general obligation bonds for immunology and immunotherapy research, half to a single University of California-affiliated nonprofit medical research institute, half to research grants. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 20 years to repay the research bond, with some or all of the cost offset if the funded research generates revenue.

  A yes vote means

  The state could borrow $8.4 billion to support immunology and immunotherapy research by California research institutes and universities.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. YesYes54.0%6,449,704
  2. NoNo46.0%5,489,522

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 39Yes/No questioniProposition 39Ballot question

  PROHIBITS CITIZENS FROM VOTING UNLESS THEY PRESENT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED IDENTIFICATION. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Invalidates mail ballots that do not have last four digits of designated government-issued identification number written on envelope. Prohibits in-person voting without presenting government-issued identification. Fiscal Impact: Costs of between tens of millions of dollars and low hundreds of millions of dollars each year to implement new voting requirements.

  A yes vote means

  Voters would be required to present additional identifying information, such as government-issued identification, to elections officials each time they vote.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. NoNo60.6%7,356,027
  2. YesYes39.4%4,789,934

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 40Yes/No questioniProposition 40Ballot question

  IMPOSES ONE-TIME TAX ON CERTAIN TAXPAYERS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Imposes 5% tax on certain taxpayers with assets over $1 billion; revenue primarily for health care. Exempts revenues from constitutional requirements for school funding and spending limit. Fiscal Impact: Temporary revenue increase of tens of billions of dollars spread over several years from wealth tax on billionaires. Possible ongoing decrease of less than $1 billion per year in income tax revenue from billionaires.

  A yes vote means

  The state would collect a one-time tax from billionaires equal to 5 percent of their wealth.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. NoNo52.5%6,379,810
  2. YesYes47.5%5,782,729

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 41Yes/No questioniProposition 41Ballot question

  PROHIBITS NEW STATE TAXES THAT EXCLUDE REVENUES FROM STATE SPENDING LIMIT. REQUIRES AUDITS FOR NEW STATE SPECIAL TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Nullifies state taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that exempt their revenues from voter-approved state spending limit. Requires pre-election and recurring audits of programs funded by new special taxes. Fiscal Impact: The net fiscal effect is unknown as it depends on future decisions by voters, the Legislature, and other policymakers.

  A yes vote means

  The State Auditor would review programs funded by new special taxes, and the state might not be able to exclude new special tax spending from its spending limit.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. NoNo55.1%6,575,557
  2. YesYes44.9%5,365,971

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 42Yes/No questioniProposition 42Ballot question

  PROHIBITS NEW STATE PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES AND CERTAIN RETROACTIVE STATE TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Prohibits any new state tax (1) imposed on the ownership of personal property (all things people own other than real estate), or (2) that applies retroactively based on taxpayer’s past activities. Nullifies taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that conflict with this measure. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that tax revenues will not go up as much in the future.

  A yes vote means

  The state could not establish new taxes on the ownership of financial assets or other personal property.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. YesYes51.4%6,197,982
  2. NoNo48.6%5,860,395

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 43Yes/No questioniProposition 43Ballot question

  LIMITS VOTERS’ ABILITY TO RAISE REVENUES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Limits voters’ ability to pass voter-proposed local special taxes by increasing percentage of votes needed to approve such ballot measures from a majority (over 50%) to two-thirds, beginning January 1, 2027. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that local government tax revenues will not go up as much in the future due to a higher vote threshold for certain taxes.

  A yes vote means

  Certain voter-proposed local special taxes would require two-thirds voter approval instead of a majority.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. NoNo57.4%6,804,870
  2. YesYes42.6%5,042,901

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 44Yes/No questioniProposition 44Ballot question

  REQUIRES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS SPEND 90% OF REVENUE ON PROGRAM SERVICES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Imposes penalties on nonprofit Federally Qualified Health Centers (community clinics providing primary care to medically underserved areas and populations) that spend less than 90% of revenue on “program services” advancing their charitable purpose, including but not limited to patient services. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs in the low tens of millions of dollars per year, covered by fees.

  A yes vote means

  Certain private nonprofit health clinics would have to spend at least 90 percent of their revenue each year on providing health care services.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. NoNo82.1%9,713,528
  2. YesYes17.9%2,121,976

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• California Proposition 45Yes/No questioniProposition 45Ballot question

  MODIFIES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Amends California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to expedite environmental review for certain projects (including most housing, transportation, water, and health projects) by setting deadlines to complete environmental review and resolve lawsuits challenging project approvals. Fiscal Impact: Initial costs for state and local governments, likely in the high tens of millions of dollars—potentially exceeding $100 million—annually, partly covered by fees. Uncertain, potentially more significant positive or negative longer-term fiscal effects.

  A yes vote means

  Certain public and private projects would be eligible for new environmental review and court challenge procedures with tighter time limits.

  Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. NoNo56.3%6,646,965
  2. YesYes43.7%5,154,160

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State

Judicial retention 13

• Retention of Associate Justice Charles A. Smiley, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1Yes/No question
  iAssociate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Charles A. Smiley, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1Ballot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Charles A. Smiley, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Charles A. Smiley, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  1. YesYes87.9%209,151
  2. NoNo12.1%28,823
  San Francisco County voters only514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Retention of Associate Justice Danny Y. Chou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5Yes/No question
  iAssociate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Danny Y. Chou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5Ballot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Danny Y. Chou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Danny Y. Chou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  1. YesYes88.6%209,714
  2. NoNo11.4%26,891
  San Francisco County voters only514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Retention of Associate Justice Gordon Burns, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5Yes/No question
  iAssociate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Gordon Burns, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5Ballot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Gordon Burns, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Gordon Burns, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  1. YesYes87.6%205,268
  2. NoNo12.4%29,047
  San Francisco County voters only514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Retention of Associate Justice Ioana Petrou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3Yes/No question
  iAssociate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Ioana Petrou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3Ballot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Ioana Petrou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Ioana Petrou, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  1. YesYes87.7%206,868
  2. NoNo12.3%29,120
  San Francisco County voters only514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Retention of Associate Justice Joshua Groban, California Supreme CourtYes/No questioniAssociate Justice Joshua GrobanBallot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Associate Justice Joshua Groban be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Joshua Groban on the California Supreme Court for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. YesYes71.4%6,844,523
  2. NoNo28.6%2,738,260

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• Retention of Associate Justice Kathleen M. Banke, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1Yes/No question
  iAssociate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Kathleen M. Banke, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1Ballot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Kathleen M. Banke, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Kathleen M. Banke, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  1. YesYes87.9%209,320
  2. NoNo12.1%28,837
  San Francisco County voters only514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Retention of Associate Justice Kelli M. Evans, California Supreme CourtYes/No questioniAssociate Justice Kelli M. EvansBallot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Associate Justice Kelli M. Evans be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Kelli M. Evans on the California Supreme Court for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  StatewideSan Francisco County only
  1. YesYes72.4%6,931,908
  2. NoNo27.6%2,642,432

  Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
• Retention of Associate Justice Mark Simons, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5Yes/No question
  iAssociate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Mark Simons, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5Ballot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Mark Simons, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Mark Simons, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  1. YesYes87.1%204,884
  2. NoNo12.9%30,412
  San Francisco County voters only514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Retention of Associate Justice Monique Langhorne Wilson, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1Yes/No question
  iAssociate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Monique Langhorne Wilson, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1Ballot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Monique Langhorne Wilson, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Monique Langhorne Wilson, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 1 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  1. YesYes89.3%213,620
  2. NoNo10.7%25,570
  San Francisco County voters only514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Retention of Associate Justice Tara M. Desautels, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2Yes/No question
  iAssociate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Tara M. Desautels, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2Ballot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Tara M. Desautels, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Tara M. Desautels, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  1. YesYes88.6%209,164
  2. NoNo11.4%26,806
  San Francisco County voters only514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Retention of Associate Justice Victor A. Rodriguez, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3Yes/No question
  iAssociate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Victor A. Rodriguez, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3Ballot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Victor A. Rodriguez, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Victor A. Rodriguez, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 3 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  1. YesYes88.2%206,999
  2. NoNo11.8%27,693
  San Francisco County voters only514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Retention of Presiding Justice Therese M. Stewart, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2Yes/No question
  iPresiding Justice Retention of Presiding Justice Therese M. Stewart, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2Ballot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Presiding Justice Retention of Presiding Justice Therese M. Stewart, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Retention of Presiding Justice Therese M. Stewart, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 2 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  1. YesYes89.2%212,043
  2. NoNo10.8%25,587
  San Francisco County voters only514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Retention of Presiding Justice Tracie L. Brown, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4Yes/No question
  iPresiding Justice Retention of Presiding Justice Tracie L. Brown, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4Ballot question (form set by state law)

  Shall Presiding Justice Retention of Presiding Justice Tracie L. Brown, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4 be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

  A yes vote means

  A yes vote keeps Retention of Presiding Justice Tracie L. Brown, Court of Appeal, First District, Division 4 on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
  1. YesYes89.0%209,522
  2. NoNo11.0%25,845
  San Francisco County voters only514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections

U.S. House 2

• U.S. Representative District 112 candidates
  1. Scott Wiener53.3%160,400
  2. Connie Chan46.7%140,395
  San Francisco County voters only453 of 453 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• U.S. Representative District 152 candidates
  1. Kevin Mullin81.3%24,702
  2. CHCharles Hoelter18.7%5,693
  San Francisco County voters only61 of 61 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections

State Legislature 2

• California State Assembly District 172 candidates
  1. Matt HaneyD90.2%159,552
  2. MNManuel Noris-BarreraR9.8%17,399
  San Francisco County voters only298 of 298 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• California State Assembly District 192 candidates
  1. Catherine StefaniD85.1%122,627
  2. PLPhilip Louis WingR14.9%21,444
  San Francisco County voters only214 of 214 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections

County and Superior Court 7

• Assessor-Recorder (ranked-choice; first choices shown)1 candidate1 candidate for 1 seat
  1. Joaquin Torres100.0%235,802
  2. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%0
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Member, Board of Supervisors, District 2 (ranked-choice; first choices shown)4 candidatesTop 1 of 4 wins
  1. Stephen Sherrill84.1%22,984
  2. MRMonthanus Ratanapakdee7.5%2,057
  3. NBNicholas Berg5.7%1,550
  4. GMGuy McCoy2.8%752
  5. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%0
  San Francisco County count47 of 47 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Member, Board of Supervisors, District 4 (ranked-choice; first choices shown)3 candidatesTop 1 of 3 wins
  1. Alan Wong64.8%18,255
  2. ACAlbert Chow17.7%4,988
  3. JJJeremy Julian Greco17.5%4,916
  4. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%0
  San Francisco County count47 of 47 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Member, Board of Supervisors, District 6 (ranked-choice; first choices shown)2 candidates
  1. Matt Dorsey79.0%13,189
  2. ABAlex Behrend21.0%3,510
  3. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%0
  San Francisco County count43 of 43 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Member, Board of Supervisors, District 8 (ranked-choice; first choices shown)4 candidatesTop 1 of 4 wins
  1. GMGary McCoy50.0%19,981
  2. Darshini Patel27.1%10,821
  3. MTMichael T. Nguyen11.7%4,658
  4. EYEmanuel "Manny" Yekutiel11.3%4,520
  5. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%0
  San Francisco County count58 of 58 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Member, Board of Supervisors, District 10 (ranked-choice; first choices shown)10 candidatesTop 1 of 10 wins
  1. Theo Ellington48.6%9,727
  2. DBDionjay (dj) Brookter19.4%3,887
  3. J.R. Eppler12.4%2,486
  4. JPJessica Pessecow5.9%1,172
  5. MTMike Trouble Lin3.9%778
  6. DBDeandra Bryant3.6%715
  7. EMEllsworth "Ell" M. Jennison, Jr.1.9%378
  8. SMShawn M. Richard1.7%335
  9. JMJamo Muhammad1.5%292
  10. PBPearci "Pj" Bastiany III1.2%238
  11. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%0
  San Francisco County count51 of 51 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Public Defender (ranked-choice; first choices shown)1 candidate1 candidate for 1 seat
  1. Mano Raju100.0%225,098
  2. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%0
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections

School and college boards 3

City College of San Francisco

• City College of San Francisco Board of Trustees, Full Term8 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 8 win
  1. MLMonroe Lace20.6%139,681
  2. EBElijah Ball19.5%131,876
  3. ETErwin Tam18.7%126,270
  4. LLLeah Lacroix13.1%88,719
  5. BMBunny McFadden12.8%86,636
  6. JLJeremy Lee10.0%67,488
  7. LPLisa P Wynn II2.7%18,174
  8. RMRome Moses Jones2.6%17,629
  9. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%0
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• City College of San Francisco Board of Trustees, Partial Term1 candidate1 candidate for 1 seat
  1. RFRuth Ferguson100.0%211,733
  2. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%0
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections

San Francisco Unified School District

• San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education Member8 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 8 win
  1. Phil Kim21.6%162,139
  2. Tim Tung15.5%116,062
  3. Autumn Brown Garibay15.4%115,891
  4. VCVirginia Cheung13.3%100,039
  5. RTReina Tello11.9%89,663
  6. RHRyan Hazelton11.9%89,448
  7. Alida Fisher6.7%49,942
  8. LLLaurance Lee3.6%27,103
  9. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%0
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections

Special districts 1

BART Board of Directors, District

• BART Board of Directors, District 81 candidate1 candidate for 1 seat
  1. SBSara Barz100.0%106,934
  2. WWrite-inWrite-in0.0%0
  San Francisco County count244 of 244 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections

County, school and district measures 11

• Measure A – City and County of San Francisco, Charter Changes to City Departments and CommissionsYes/No question
  iMeasure ABallot question

  Shall the City amend the Charter to align it with how some City departments currently operate, change some processes, eliminate or reorganize certain commissions and advisory bodies, and require the Board of Supervisors to amend voter-approved laws to enact some of these changes?

  A yes vote means

  A YES vote amends the City Charter to reflect how some departments currently operate, change some processes, eliminate or reorganize certain commissions and advisory bodies, and require the Board of Supervisors to amend voter-approved laws to carry out some of the changes.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: San Francisco City Attorney, letter to Director of Elections 'Re: November 3, 2026 Ballot Questions' ↗
  1. YesYes68.0%221,089
  2. NoNo32.0%104,265
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Measure B – City and County of San Francisco, Municipal Finance Corporation and Public BankYes/No question
  iMeasure BBallot question

  Shall the City amend the Charter to authorize the City to establish a municipal finance corporation and a public bank?

  A yes vote means

  A YES vote amends the City Charter to authorize San Francisco to establish a municipal finance corporation and a public bank.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: San Francisco City Attorney, letter to Director of Elections 'Re: November 3, 2026 Ballot Questions' ↗
  1. YesYes52.7%169,415
  2. NoNo47.3%152,252
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Measure C – City and County of San Francisco, Housing Trust Fund ContributionsYes/No question
  iMeasure CBallot question

  Shall the City amend the Charter to change how the City's annual contributions to the Housing Trust Fund are set, increase funding and expand programs for affordable housing, and extend the Fund to 2058?

  A yes vote means

  A YES vote amends the City Charter to change how the City's annual Housing Trust Fund contributions are set, increase funding and expand affordable-housing programs, and extend the Fund to 2058.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: San Francisco City Attorney, letter to Director of Elections 'Re: November 3, 2026 Ballot Questions' ↗
  1. YesYes81.8%266,565
  2. NoNo18.2%59,349
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Measure D – City and County of San Francisco, Ballot Measure Process ChangesYes/No question
  iMeasure DBallot question

  Shall the City amend the Charter to increase the requirements for signature initiatives from 2% to 8% of registered voters in San Francisco (currently from about 10,600 to about 42,500 signatures), increase the requirements for calling special elections, allow signature initiatives to be withdrawn before an election, and remove the ability of a minority of Board of Supervisors members or the Mayor to place measures on the ballot?

  A yes vote means

  A YES vote amends the City Charter to raise the signature requirement for citizen initiatives from 2% to 8% of registered voters, tighten the rules for calling special elections, allow initiatives to be withdrawn before an election, and end the ability of the Mayor or a minority of supervisors to place measures on the ballot.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: San Francisco City Attorney, letter to Director of Elections 'Re: November 3, 2026 Ballot Questions' ↗
  1. YesYes54.2%178,653
  2. NoNo45.8%151,011
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Measure E – City and County of San Francisco, City Administrator Authority and ContractingYes/No question
  iMeasure EBallot question

  Shall the City amend the Charter to give the City Administrator more authority by centralizing the City's purchasing rules and processes, changing how the City approves purchasing rules, changing when contracts and leases require Board of Supervisors approval, and extending the City Administrator's term?

  A yes vote means

  A YES vote amends the City Charter to centralize purchasing rules under the City Administrator, change how those rules and which contracts and leases need Board of Supervisors approval, and lengthen the City Administrator's term.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: San Francisco City Attorney, letter to Director of Elections 'Re: November 3, 2026 Ballot Questions' ↗
  1. YesYes63.8%207,405
  2. NoNo36.2%117,874
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Measure F – City and County of San Francisco, Executive Branch ManagementYes/No question
  iMeasure FBallot question

  Shall the City amend the Charter to expand the Mayor's authority to transfer responsibilities between departments, hire deputy mayors, and hire some and fire most department heads; and to allow City officials to remove members of boards and commissions without cause?

  A yes vote means

  A YES vote amends the City Charter to let the Mayor move responsibilities between departments, hire deputy mayors, and hire some and fire most department heads, and to let City officials remove board and commission members without cause.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: San Francisco City Attorney, letter to Director of Elections 'Re: November 3, 2026 Ballot Questions' ↗
  1. YesYes59.5%194,386
  2. NoNo40.5%132,581
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Measure G – City and County of San Francisco, Private Vehicles on the Upper Great HighwayYes/No question
  iMeasure GBallot question

  Shall the City close Sunset Dunes Park from Monday at 4:00 a.m. through Friday at 6:00 p.m., unless a holiday falls on a weekday, in order to reopen the roadway known as the Upper Great Highway to private vehicles during that time?

  A yes vote means

  A YES vote closes Sunset Dunes Park on non-holiday weekdays, from Monday 4 a.m. through Friday 6 p.m., so the Upper Great Highway can reopen to private vehicles during those hours.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: San Francisco City Attorney, letter to Director of Elections 'Re: November 3, 2026 Ballot Questions' ↗
  1. NoNo65.7%215,803
  2. YesYes34.3%112,765
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Measure H – City and County of San Francisco, Parcel Tax for Muni OperationsYes/No question
  iMeasure HBallot question

  Shall the City fund Muni service through a new annual parcel tax on real estate at rates ranging from $129 per parcel up to a maximum of $400,000 per parcel, depending on the type of property and its size and adjusted annually for inflation, for estimated revenue of $177 million a year for 15 years?

  A yes vote means

  A YES vote imposes a 15-year annual parcel tax on San Francisco real estate, from $129 up to a $400,000 cap per parcel depending on property type and size and adjusted for inflation, raising an estimated $177 million a year for Muni service.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: San Francisco City Attorney, letter to Director of Elections 'Re: November 3, 2026 Ballot Questions' ↗
  1. YesYes74.4%244,760
  2. NoNo25.6%84,209
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Measure I – City and County of San Francisco, Real Property Transfer Tax ChangesYes/No question
  iMeasure IBallot question

  Shall the City permanently dedicate half of the transfer tax revenues collected when certain real estate with a value or sales price of more than $10,000,000 changes hands, which will continue to be taxed at rates of 5.5% to 6%, to be spent only on affordable housing, including social housing developments and housing assistance, and exempt certain sales from the dedicated portion of the tax, for an estimated annual revenue decrease of approximately $1 million?

  A yes vote means

  A YES vote permanently dedicates half of the transfer tax on real estate sales over $10 million (still taxed at 5.5% to 6%) to affordable housing and housing assistance, with some sales exempt from the dedicated portion.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: San Francisco City Attorney, letter to Director of Elections 'Re: November 3, 2026 Ballot Questions' ↗
  1. NoNo51.7%166,070
  2. YesYes48.3%155,384
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Measure J – City and County of San Francisco, Transfer Tax Foreclosure Exemption RemovalYes/No question
  iMeasure JBallot question

  Shall the City permanently apply a transfer tax of between 0.5% and 6% of a property's fair market value, on the transfer of properties such as commercial, industrial, and large residential properties, that are transferred to a lender because of foreclosure or to avoid foreclosure, for estimated annual revenue of $100 million to $150 million?

  A yes vote means

  A YES vote applies the real property transfer tax, at 0.5% to 6% of fair market value, to commercial, industrial and larger residential properties transferred to a lender through or in lieu of foreclosure, estimated to raise $100 million to $150 million a year.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: San Francisco City Attorney, letter to Director of Elections 'Re: November 3, 2026 Ballot Questions' ↗
  1. YesYes80.9%260,241
  2. NoNo19.1%61,529
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections
• Measure RTM – Regional Transit Measure (Public Transit Revenue Measure District)Yes/No question
  iMeasure RTMBallot question

  To prevent major service cuts to BART and other transit, avoid increased traffic, and reduce pollution by: Preserving BART, Caltrain, VTA, SamTrans, AC Transit, Muni, other transit for everyone, including workers, students, seniors, persons with disabilities; Supporting transit safety, cleanliness, affordability, reliability; Repairing targeted roads/potholes; Requiring financial transparency, oversight, accountability; shall the measure enacting a 0.5% (Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, Santa Clara counties), and 1% (San Francisco) sales tax for 14 years generating approximately $980,000,000 annually, be adopted?

  A yes vote means

  A YES vote enacts a 14-year regional sales tax for transit, 1% in San Francisco and 0.5% in Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties, estimated to raise about $980 million a year.

  Needed to pass

  Majority

  Source: Public Transit Revenue Measure District ↗
  1. YesYes79.2%259,562
  2. NoNo20.8%68,311
  San Francisco County count514 of 514 precinctsUpdated November 10, 2026, 4:00 p.m. PTSource: San Francisco Department of Elections