Paper Trail Politics Election directory My Area

November 3, 2026 General Election · Election night returns

Siskiyou County election results

16,497ballots counted59.5% of 27,706 registered voters
~902ballots left to countcounty estimate
51contests on the ballotwith semi-official returns

Turnout as ballots are counted

Same point in the count (3 days after Election Day):

  • 202659.5%so far
Nov 2022 generalNov 2024 generalNov 2026
0%20%40%60%80%Election Day+7 days+14 days+21 days+28 days2022: 62.3% final2024: 77.9% final2026: 59.5%0%20%40%60%80%Election Day+14 days+28 days2022 62.3%2024 77.9%2026 59.5%
Show the data
YearCounty reportHours after polls closedBallots countedTurnout
20222022-11-28 13:56473.917,90762.32%
20242024-12-03 08:44660.721,80377.93%
20262026-11-06 13:4065.716,49759.54%

From the county’s results updates, timed from 8 p.m. on Election Day; earlier years are linear between updates.

D DemocraticR Republican* IncumbentLocal offices are nonpartisan.

Where available, statewide or districtwide totals from the California Secretary of State are shown first. Races that extend beyond this county offer “County only” for the county registrar’s count. Reports may update at different times.

Statewide offices 9

State propositions 14

  • California Proposition 1Yes/No questionProposition 1Ballot question

    AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR HOUSING AFFORDABILITY PROGRAMS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $11.25 billion in state general obligation bonds for housing affordability programs, including multifamily rental housing, mortgages for veterans, supportive housing, preservation of existing affordable housing, and downpayment assistance. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 25 years to repay the housing bond.

    A yes vote means

    The state could borrow $11.25 billion through general obligation bonds to support veterans and affordable housing programs.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes61.1%7,310,455
    2. NoNo38.9%4,663,551
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 2Yes/No questionProposition 2Ballot question

    INCREASES STATE’S RAINY DAY FUND. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Increases California's Rainy Day Fund, approved by voters in 2014, to provide funding for education, health care, public safety, and other essential services during economic downturns. Fiscal Impact: State budget reserves would be higher.

    A yes vote means

    State budget reserve rules would change so the Rainy Day Fund holds more money, and the state would make extra debt payments for longer.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes61.3%7,331,507
    2. NoNo38.7%4,632,231
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 3Yes/No questionProposition 3Ballot question

    PROVIDES PERMANENT FUNDING FOR SCHOOLS AND HEALTH CARE BY EXTENDING EXISTING TAX ON HIGH INCOMES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Makes permanent existing voter-approved tax rates for individuals earning over $371,000 (adjusted annually for inflation). Allocates tax revenues to public education. Fiscal Impact: Maintains $5 billion to $15 billion of annual state income tax revenue by making a temporary tax increase on high-income earners permanent instead of letting it expire in 2031.

    A yes vote means

    An income tax increase on high-income earners in place since 2012 would become permanent instead of expiring in 2031.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes60.7%7,325,303
    2. NoNo39.3%4,746,890
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 4Yes/No questionProposition 4Ballot question

    REPEALS PROHIBITION AGAINST PUBLIC FUNDING OF ELECTION CAMPAIGNS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Repeals prohibition on state and local governments offering public funding of candidate election campaigns. Public funding programs may not use funds earmarked for education, transportation, or public safety. Fiscal Impact: Ongoing costs to the state of a few hundred thousand dollars each year for the Fair Political Practices Commission to answer questions from state and local governments about public campaign finance programs.

    A yes vote means

    State and local governments could create public campaign financing programs for candidates, subject to limits on which public funds could be used and how.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo50.3%5,943,929
    2. YesYes49.7%5,872,250
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 5Yes/No questionProposition 5Ballot question

    CHANGES RECALL ELECTION PROCESS FOR STATEWIDE OFFICERS. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Under current law, voters elect replacement candidates at the same time as the recall election. This measure instead fills recall vacancies by subsequent special election or appointment. Fiscal Impact: Net fiscal effect unknown. In the event of a recall, savings or costs of millions of dollars to administer the election depending on the office recalled.

    A yes vote means

    Recall elections would no longer ask who should fill the vacancy; vacancies typically would be filled by special election or appointment.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes51.9%6,030,402
    2. NoNo48.1%5,585,459
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 37Yes/No questionProposition 37Ballot question

    CREATES LOAN PROGRAM FOR MIDDLE-INCOME BUYERS OF QUALIFIED NEW HOMES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $25 billion in bonds to offer eligible buyers fixed-rate mortgages for up to 17% of purchase price of a newly constructed home priced below about $1.5 million. Borrowers must be California residents, occupy the home, meet income limits, and pay at least 3% down. Bonds repaid by mortgage payments, not State. Fiscal Impact: No direct state or local costs.

    A yes vote means

    The state would create a homebuying assistance program funded by up to $25 billion in revenue bonds repaid by homeowners' loan payments.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes62.4%7,431,832
    2. NoNo37.6%4,478,694
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 38Yes/No questionProposition 38Ballot question

    AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR IMMUNOLOGY MEDICAL RESEARCH. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $8.4 billion in general obligation bonds for immunology and immunotherapy research, half to a single University of California-affiliated nonprofit medical research institute, half to research grants. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 20 years to repay the research bond, with some or all of the cost offset if the funded research generates revenue.

    A yes vote means

    The state could borrow $8.4 billion to support immunology and immunotherapy research by California research institutes and universities.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes54.0%6,449,704
    2. NoNo46.0%5,489,522
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 39Yes/No questionProposition 39Ballot question

    PROHIBITS CITIZENS FROM VOTING UNLESS THEY PRESENT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED IDENTIFICATION. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Invalidates mail ballots that do not have last four digits of designated government-issued identification number written on envelope. Prohibits in-person voting without presenting government-issued identification. Fiscal Impact: Costs of between tens of millions of dollars and low hundreds of millions of dollars each year to implement new voting requirements.

    A yes vote means

    Voters would be required to present additional identifying information, such as government-issued identification, to elections officials each time they vote.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo60.6%7,356,027
    2. YesYes39.4%4,789,934
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 40Yes/No questionProposition 40Ballot question

    IMPOSES ONE-TIME TAX ON CERTAIN TAXPAYERS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Imposes 5% tax on certain taxpayers with assets over $1 billion; revenue primarily for health care. Exempts revenues from constitutional requirements for school funding and spending limit. Fiscal Impact: Temporary revenue increase of tens of billions of dollars spread over several years from wealth tax on billionaires. Possible ongoing decrease of less than $1 billion per year in income tax revenue from billionaires.

    A yes vote means

    The state would collect a one-time tax from billionaires equal to 5 percent of their wealth.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo52.5%6,379,810
    2. YesYes47.5%5,782,729
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 41Yes/No questionProposition 41Ballot question

    PROHIBITS NEW STATE TAXES THAT EXCLUDE REVENUES FROM STATE SPENDING LIMIT. REQUIRES AUDITS FOR NEW STATE SPECIAL TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Nullifies state taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that exempt their revenues from voter-approved state spending limit. Requires pre-election and recurring audits of programs funded by new special taxes. Fiscal Impact: The net fiscal effect is unknown as it depends on future decisions by voters, the Legislature, and other policymakers.

    A yes vote means

    The State Auditor would review programs funded by new special taxes, and the state might not be able to exclude new special tax spending from its spending limit.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo55.1%6,575,557
    2. YesYes44.9%5,365,971
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 42Yes/No questionProposition 42Ballot question

    PROHIBITS NEW STATE PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES AND CERTAIN RETROACTIVE STATE TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Prohibits any new state tax (1) imposed on the ownership of personal property (all things people own other than real estate), or (2) that applies retroactively based on taxpayer’s past activities. Nullifies taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that conflict with this measure. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that tax revenues will not go up as much in the future.

    A yes vote means

    The state could not establish new taxes on the ownership of financial assets or other personal property.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes51.4%6,197,982
    2. NoNo48.6%5,860,395
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 43Yes/No questionProposition 43Ballot question

    LIMITS VOTERS’ ABILITY TO RAISE REVENUES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Limits voters’ ability to pass voter-proposed local special taxes by increasing percentage of votes needed to approve such ballot measures from a majority (over 50%) to two-thirds, beginning January 1, 2027. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that local government tax revenues will not go up as much in the future due to a higher vote threshold for certain taxes.

    A yes vote means

    Certain voter-proposed local special taxes would require two-thirds voter approval instead of a majority.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo57.4%6,804,870
    2. YesYes42.6%5,042,901
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 44Yes/No questionProposition 44Ballot question

    REQUIRES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS SPEND 90% OF REVENUE ON PROGRAM SERVICES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Imposes penalties on nonprofit Federally Qualified Health Centers (community clinics providing primary care to medically underserved areas and populations) that spend less than 90% of revenue on “program services” advancing their charitable purpose, including but not limited to patient services. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs in the low tens of millions of dollars per year, covered by fees.

    A yes vote means

    Certain private nonprofit health clinics would have to spend at least 90 percent of their revenue each year on providing health care services.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo82.1%9,713,528
    2. YesYes17.9%2,121,976
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 45Yes/No questionProposition 45Ballot question

    MODIFIES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Amends California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to expedite environmental review for certain projects (including most housing, transportation, water, and health projects) by setting deadlines to complete environmental review and resolve lawsuits challenging project approvals. Fiscal Impact: Initial costs for state and local governments, likely in the high tens of millions of dollars—potentially exceeding $100 million—annually, partly covered by fees. Uncertain, potentially more significant positive or negative longer-term fiscal effects.

    A yes vote means

    Certain public and private projects would be eligible for new environmental review and court challenge procedures with tighter time limits.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo56.3%6,646,965
    2. YesYes43.7%5,154,160
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State

Judicial retention 9

  • Retention of Administrative Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Presiding Justice Retention of Administrative Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Presiding Justice Retention of Administrative Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Administrative Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes59.8%7,723
    2. NoNo40.2%5,193
    Siskiyou County voters only62 of 62 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections
  • Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes55.5%6,911
    2. NoNo44.5%5,531
    Siskiyou County voters only62 of 62 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections
  • Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes54.1%6,733
    2. NoNo45.9%5,722
    Siskiyou County voters only62 of 62 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections
  • Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes58.7%7,287
    2. NoNo41.3%5,121
    Siskiyou County voters only62 of 62 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections
  • Retention of Associate Justice Joshua Groban, California Supreme CourtYes/No questionAssociate Justice Joshua GrobanBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Joshua Groban be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Joshua Groban on the California Supreme Court for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes71.4%6,844,523
    2. NoNo28.6%2,738,260
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • Retention of Associate Justice Kelli M. Evans, California Supreme CourtYes/No questionAssociate Justice Kelli M. EvansBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Kelli M. Evans be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Kelli M. Evans on the California Supreme Court for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes72.4%6,931,908
    2. NoNo27.6%2,642,432
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 12, 2026, 7:53 a.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes57.4%7,382
    2. NoNo42.6%5,485
    Siskiyou County voters only62 of 62 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections
  • Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes51.2%6,368
    2. NoNo48.8%6,064
    Siskiyou County voters only62 of 62 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections
  • Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes57.3%7,137
    2. NoNo42.7%5,316
    Siskiyou County voters only62 of 62 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

U.S. House 1

  • U.S. Representative District 22 candidates
    1. Robin LittauR56.7%9,092
    2. Jared HuffmanD43.3%6,942
    Siskiyou County voters only62 of 62 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

State Legislature 1

City offices 8

Dorris

  • City of Dorris City Council Member3 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 3 win
    1. EREric Ray Stafford35.9%90
    2. DGDonald "Duck" G. Clontz32.3%81
    3. AWAbner Weed31.9%80
    Siskiyou County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

Dunsmuir

  • City of Dunsmuir City Council Member6 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 6 win
    1. Alan Clother21.3%267
    2. Michael W Clarno20.6%259
    3. Matthew J. Bryan18.5%232
    4. AMAndrew McLane14.6%183
    5. BWBrian Wilson14.2%178
    6. CGCami Giacomelli-10.9%137
    Siskiyou County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

Etna

  • City of Etna City Council Member, Full Term4 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 4 win
    1. JSJohn Stacher32.7%163
    2. JDJason Deppen25.9%129
    3. BFBrandon Fawaz24.2%121
    4. MTMitch Trost17.2%86
    Siskiyou County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

Montague

  • City of Montague City Council Member, Full Term3 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 3 win
    1. GEGregory E Johnson44.0%315
    2. PVPatrick Vela31.4%225
    3. LALinda Avila24.6%176
    Siskiyou County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections
  • City of Montague City Council Member, Short Term1 candidate1 candidate for 1 seat
    1. JRJohn R. McCarthy100.0%392
    Siskiyou County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

Mt Shasta

  • City of Mt Shasta City Council Member5 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 5 win
    1. Kenji Guy Dorsey-Imabori28.2%639
    2. WAWendy A. Warnick22.4%507
    3. Tim Stearns20.0%453
    4. VBVicki Barr16.5%373
    5. Roslyn McCoy12.8%290
    Siskiyou County count3 of 3 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

Weed

  • City of Weed City Council Member2 candidates · vote for 32 candidates for 3 seats
    1. MGMarie Gates-Green54.1%393
    2. DWDarrell W. Parham45.9%334
    Siskiyou County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

Yreka

  • City of Yreka City Council Member6 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 6 win
    1. Colleen Baker23.2%1,229
    2. Jason K Williams20.7%1,097
    3. Rhetta Hogan20.1%1,066
    4. Ian Davis19.3%1,025
    5. BVBen Villegas12.2%647
    6. Francisco Gomez4.4%235
    Siskiyou County count6 of 6 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

City measures 3

Mt. Shasta

  • Measure H – City of Mt. Shasta, Sales TaxYes/No question
    Measure HBallot question

    To prevent cuts to its Police and Fire Departments, maintain public safety, prevent and protect against wildfires, provide rapid responses to 911 emergencies, add needed police officers, firefighters, and paramedics, and for general government use, shall the City of Mount Shasta adopt an ordinance establishing a one percent sales (transactions and use) tax, providing approximately $1.5m annually until ended by voters, with strict accountability, annual audits, citizen oversight, and all funds legally required to stay in Mount Shasta?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote establishes a one percent sales (transactions and use) tax in the City of Mount Shasta, raising about $1.5 million a year for police, fire, wildfire protection, emergency response and general city services, until ended by voters.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Siskiyou County Clerk, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election – Revised Notice of Election and Date Fixed for Ballot Arguments, Measure H, City of Mt Shasta ↗
    1. YesYes65.0%893
    2. NoNo35.0%480
    Siskiyou County count3 of 3 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

Weed

  • Measure K – City of Weed, Sales TaxYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure KBallot question

    Shall a measure maintaining 911 emergency services, fire protection and wildfire prevention, emergency medical response; 24-hour police patrol/protection, building safety and inspection; streets, roads, sidewalks and City infrastructure; snow removal, and other general City services, long-term financial stability, by establishing a 1.5% sales tax providing approximately $1,700,000 annually until repealed by voters, subject to regular audits, be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote establishes a 1.5% sales tax in the City of Weed, raising about $1.7 million a year for emergency, fire, police, street, snow removal and other general city services, until repealed by voters.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Siskiyou County Clerk, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election – Notice of Election and Date Fixed for Ballot Arguments, Measure K, City of Weed ↗
    1. YesYes60.5%373
    2. NoNo39.5%243
    Siskiyou County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

Yreka

  • Measure G – City of Yreka, Hotel TaxYes/No question
    Measure GBallot question

    To provide funding (all funds used for local services) for infrastructure and general City services, including, but not limited to, public safety, park and recreation programming, community events, and local economic development, shall the City increase the transient occupancy tax (hotel tax) rate from 10% to 12% on July 1, 2027, with an estimated increase of $245,000.00 generated annually from the resulting tax and will remain in effect until repealed or amended?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote raises the City of Yreka's transient occupancy (hotel) tax from 10% to 12% starting July 1, 2027, raising an estimated $245,000 more a year for infrastructure and general city services, until repealed or amended.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Siskiyou County Clerk, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election – Notice of Election and Date Fixed for Ballot Arguments, Measure G, City of Yreka ↗
    1. YesYes56.5%1,314
    2. NoNo43.5%1,011
    Siskiyou County count6 of 6 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

School and college boards 3

County Superintendent of Schools

  • County Superintendent of Schools2 candidates
    1. Allan S Carver51.8%6,987
    2. Mark Greenfield48.2%6,490
    Siskiyou County count62 of 62 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

Scott Valley Unified School District

  • Scott Valley Unified School District Trustee, Area 22 candidates
    1. AHAnne Hilton63.7%778
    2. TJTiffany Johnson36.3%444
    Siskiyou County count4 of 4 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

Siskiyou Joint Community College District

  • Siskiyou Joint Community College District Trustee, Area 32 candidates
    1. DRDennis Roberts56.4%965
    2. Carol L. Cupp43.6%746
    Siskiyou County count6 of 6 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

County, school and district measures 3

  • Measure I – Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District, Special Parcel TaxYes/No questionNeeds two-thirds to pass
    Measure IBallot question

    Shall an ordinance of the Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District imposing an annual special parcel tax to maintain and improve fire protection and prevention services in the amount of $50 per parcel for unimproved parcels, $100 per parcel for improved parcels, and $150 for commercial parcels for each business occupancy, estimated to raise approximately $106,250 annually, which shall continue until repealed by the voters, be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote imposes an annual special parcel tax for the Tulelake Multi-County Fire Protection District of $50 per unimproved parcel, $100 per improved parcel and $150 per commercial business occupancy, raising about $106,250 a year for fire protection, until repealed by voters.

    Needed to pass

    Two-thirds

    Source: Siskiyou County Clerk, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election – Notice of Election and Date Fixed for Ballot Arguments, Measure I, Tulelake Multicounty Fire District ↗
    1. YesYes60.6%40
    2. NoNo39.4%26
    Siskiyou County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections
  • Measure J – Mount Shasta Union School District, School BondYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure JBallot question

    With funds that cannot be taken by the State or Federal government, shall Mt. Shasta Union Elementary School District’s measure to repair/replace leaky roofs, plumbing, electrical, heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems; upgrade emergency communication systems and fire alarms be adopted, authorizing $9.1 million of bonds with legal rates, average levies below $25 per $100,000 of assessed value, ($533,000 annually while outstanding), audits, independent oversight State matching funds eligibility, no administrator salaries, pensions or benefits, and full disclosure of spending?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Mount Shasta Union School District to issue $9.1 million in bonds, with average levies below $25 per $100,000 of assessed value (about $533,000 annually), to repair roofs, plumbing, electrical and HVAC systems and upgrade emergency communication systems and fire alarms.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Siskiyou County Clerk, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election – Notice of Election and Date Fixed for Ballot Arguments, Measure J, Mt Shasta Union Elementary School District ↗
    1. YesYes68.8%2,232
    2. NoNo31.2%1,012
    Siskiyou County count9 of 9 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections
  • Measure L – Mount Shasta Fire Protection District, Spending Limit IncreaseYes/No question
    Measure LBallot question

    Shall the Mt. Shasta Fire Protection District be allowed to increase the Spending Limit Pursuant to Article 13B of the California Constitution to an amount not to exceed $425,000 for a period of time from the last election to set a spending limit for a period not to exceed the next four years?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote raises the Mount Shasta Fire Protection District's state constitutional (Article XIII B, Gann) spending limit to no more than $425,000 for up to four years. It does not itself impose a tax.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Siskiyou County Clerk, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election – Notice of Election and Date Fixed for Ballot Arguments, Measure L, Mt Shasta Fire Protection District ↗
    1. YesYes72.4%1,323
    2. NoNo27.6%505
    Siskiyou County count5 of 5 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 1:40 p.m. PTSource: Siskiyou County Elections

About this information

County results come from the Siskiyou County Elections. Statewide and districtwide totals come from the California Secretary of State. See the source links on each result; counts are semi-official and will change until certification, and no winners are called here.