Paper Trail Politics Election directory My Area

November 3, 2026 General Election · Election night returns

Ventura County election results

235,930ballots counted44.9% of 525,136 registered voters
118contests on the ballotwith semi-official returns

Turnout as ballots are counted

Same point in the count (6 days after Election Day):

  • 202644.9%so far
  • 202240.3%(56.2% final)
  • 202461.4%(76.2% final)
Nov 2022 generalNov 2024 generalNov 2026
0%20%40%60%80%Election Day+7 days+14 days+21 days+28 days2022: 56.2% final2024: 76.2% final2026: 44.9%0%20%40%60%80%Election Day+14 days+28 days2022 56.2%2024 76.2%2026 44.9%
Show the data
YearCounty reportHours after polls closedBallots countedTurnout
20222022-11-08 20:100.2131,68426.07%
20222022-11-08 22:092.2132,25726.18%
20222022-11-08 22:482.8136,24026.97%
20222022-11-08 23:153.2139,82227.68%
20222022-11-08 23:473.8142,49028.21%
20222022-11-09 00:154.2145,54928.82%
20222022-11-09 00:474.8149,48029.59%
20222022-11-09 01:275.5153,68230.43%
20222022-11-10 12:0440.1172,77634.21%
20222022-11-15 14:01162.0210,37541.65%
20222022-11-17 13:54209.9249,04149.30%
20222022-11-22 13:19329.3281,21855.67%
20222022-11-23 16:00356.0282,53355.93%
20222022-11-29 14:00498.0282,92556.01%
20222022-12-01 14:00546.0283,14256.06%
20222022-12-07 14:00690.0284,01356.23%
20222022-12-07 16:30692.5284,01356.23%
20242024-11-05 20:340.6232,44944.96%
20242024-11-05 22:332.5234,69645.40%
20242024-11-05 23:564.0243,49147.10%
20242024-11-06 01:225.4252,05648.75%
20242024-11-06 03:197.3267,22651.69%
20242024-11-07 16:0444.1278,63653.90%
20242024-11-12 14:50162.8326,92563.24%
20242024-11-14 14:58211.0363,11170.24%
20242024-11-19 15:28331.5390,51875.54%
20242024-11-21 15:09379.2392,03975.83%
20242024-11-26 15:29499.5393,52476.12%
20242024-12-03 14:25666.4394,18176.25%
20242024-12-04 14:44690.7394,19776.25%
20242024-12-04 16:30692.5394,19776.25%
20262026-11-03 20:380.6172,58632.87%
20262026-11-03 22:312.5173,34733.01%
20262026-11-04 00:364.6178,95434.08%
20262026-11-04 04:278.4195,22037.18%
20262026-11-04 15:5319.9195,22037.18%
20262026-11-05 14:5142.9208,22839.65%
20262026-11-06 17:5870.0223,95242.65%
20262026-11-06 17:5870.0223,95242.65%
20262026-11-09 15:47139.8235,93044.93%

From the county’s results updates, timed from 8 p.m. on Election Day; earlier years are linear between updates.

D DemocraticR Republican* IncumbentLocal offices are nonpartisan.

Where available, statewide or districtwide totals from the California Secretary of State are shown first. Races that extend beyond this county offer “County only” for the county registrar’s count. Reports may update at different times.

Statewide offices 9

State propositions 14

  • California Proposition 1Yes/No questionProposition 1Ballot question

    AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR HOUSING AFFORDABILITY PROGRAMS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $11.25 billion in state general obligation bonds for housing affordability programs, including multifamily rental housing, mortgages for veterans, supportive housing, preservation of existing affordable housing, and downpayment assistance. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 25 years to repay the housing bond.

    A yes vote means

    The state could borrow $11.25 billion through general obligation bonds to support veterans and affordable housing programs.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes61.0%6,733,027
    2. NoNo39.0%4,296,574
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 2Yes/No questionProposition 2Ballot question

    INCREASES STATE’S RAINY DAY FUND. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Increases California's Rainy Day Fund, approved by voters in 2014, to provide funding for education, health care, public safety, and other essential services during economic downturns. Fiscal Impact: State budget reserves would be higher.

    A yes vote means

    State budget reserve rules would change so the Rainy Day Fund holds more money, and the state would make extra debt payments for longer.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes61.3%6,759,767
    2. NoNo38.7%4,260,447
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 3Yes/No questionProposition 3Ballot question

    PROVIDES PERMANENT FUNDING FOR SCHOOLS AND HEALTH CARE BY EXTENDING EXISTING TAX ON HIGH INCOMES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Makes permanent existing voter-approved tax rates for individuals earning over $371,000 (adjusted annually for inflation). Allocates tax revenues to public education. Fiscal Impact: Maintains $5 billion to $15 billion of annual state income tax revenue by making a temporary tax increase on high-income earners permanent instead of letting it expire in 2031.

    A yes vote means

    An income tax increase on high-income earners in place since 2012 would become permanent instead of expiring in 2031.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes60.6%6,733,849
    2. NoNo39.4%4,380,460
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 4Yes/No questionProposition 4Ballot question

    REPEALS PROHIBITION AGAINST PUBLIC FUNDING OF ELECTION CAMPAIGNS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Repeals prohibition on state and local governments offering public funding of candidate election campaigns. Public funding programs may not use funds earmarked for education, transportation, or public safety. Fiscal Impact: Ongoing costs to the state of a few hundred thousand dollars each year for the Fair Political Practices Commission to answer questions from state and local governments about public campaign finance programs.

    A yes vote means

    State and local governments could create public campaign financing programs for candidates, subject to limits on which public funds could be used and how.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo50.3%5,474,047
    2. YesYes49.7%5,406,205
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 5Yes/No questionProposition 5Ballot question

    CHANGES RECALL ELECTION PROCESS FOR STATEWIDE OFFICERS. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Under current law, voters elect replacement candidates at the same time as the recall election. This measure instead fills recall vacancies by subsequent special election or appointment. Fiscal Impact: Net fiscal effect unknown. In the event of a recall, savings or costs of millions of dollars to administer the election depending on the office recalled.

    A yes vote means

    Recall elections would no longer ask who should fill the vacancy; vacancies typically would be filled by special election or appointment.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes52.0%5,562,022
    2. NoNo48.0%5,134,433
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 37Yes/No questionProposition 37Ballot question

    CREATES LOAN PROGRAM FOR MIDDLE-INCOME BUYERS OF QUALIFIED NEW HOMES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $25 billion in bonds to offer eligible buyers fixed-rate mortgages for up to 17% of purchase price of a newly constructed home priced below about $1.5 million. Borrowers must be California residents, occupy the home, meet income limits, and pay at least 3% down. Bonds repaid by mortgage payments, not State. Fiscal Impact: No direct state or local costs.

    A yes vote means

    The state would create a homebuying assistance program funded by up to $25 billion in revenue bonds repaid by homeowners' loan payments.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes62.3%6,834,106
    2. NoNo37.7%4,132,590
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 38Yes/No questionProposition 38Ballot question

    AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR IMMUNOLOGY MEDICAL RESEARCH. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $8.4 billion in general obligation bonds for immunology and immunotherapy research, half to a single University of California-affiliated nonprofit medical research institute, half to research grants. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 20 years to repay the research bond, with some or all of the cost offset if the funded research generates revenue.

    A yes vote means

    The state could borrow $8.4 billion to support immunology and immunotherapy research by California research institutes and universities.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes54.2%5,963,079
    2. NoNo45.8%5,032,758
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 39Yes/No questionProposition 39Ballot question

    PROHIBITS CITIZENS FROM VOTING UNLESS THEY PRESENT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED IDENTIFICATION. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Invalidates mail ballots that do not have last four digits of designated government-issued identification number written on envelope. Prohibits in-person voting without presenting government-issued identification. Fiscal Impact: Costs of between tens of millions of dollars and low hundreds of millions of dollars each year to implement new voting requirements.

    A yes vote means

    Voters would be required to present additional identifying information, such as government-issued identification, to elections officials each time they vote.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo60.6%6,774,474
    2. YesYes39.4%4,407,227
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 40Yes/No questionProposition 40Ballot question

    IMPOSES ONE-TIME TAX ON CERTAIN TAXPAYERS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Imposes 5% tax on certain taxpayers with assets over $1 billion; revenue primarily for health care. Exempts revenues from constitutional requirements for school funding and spending limit. Fiscal Impact: Temporary revenue increase of tens of billions of dollars spread over several years from wealth tax on billionaires. Possible ongoing decrease of less than $1 billion per year in income tax revenue from billionaires.

    A yes vote means

    The state would collect a one-time tax from billionaires equal to 5 percent of their wealth.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo52.8%5,909,899
    2. YesYes47.2%5,288,424
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 41Yes/No questionProposition 41Ballot question

    PROHIBITS NEW STATE TAXES THAT EXCLUDE REVENUES FROM STATE SPENDING LIMIT. REQUIRES AUDITS FOR NEW STATE SPECIAL TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Nullifies state taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that exempt their revenues from voter-approved state spending limit. Requires pre-election and recurring audits of programs funded by new special taxes. Fiscal Impact: The net fiscal effect is unknown as it depends on future decisions by voters, the Legislature, and other policymakers.

    A yes vote means

    The State Auditor would review programs funded by new special taxes, and the state might not be able to exclude new special tax spending from its spending limit.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo54.9%6,035,499
    2. YesYes45.1%4,961,912
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 42Yes/No questionProposition 42Ballot question

    PROHIBITS NEW STATE PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES AND CERTAIN RETROACTIVE STATE TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Prohibits any new state tax (1) imposed on the ownership of personal property (all things people own other than real estate), or (2) that applies retroactively based on taxpayer’s past activities. Nullifies taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that conflict with this measure. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that tax revenues will not go up as much in the future.

    A yes vote means

    The state could not establish new taxes on the ownership of financial assets or other personal property.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes51.6%5,733,734
    2. NoNo48.4%5,371,123
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 43Yes/No questionProposition 43Ballot question

    LIMITS VOTERS’ ABILITY TO RAISE REVENUES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Limits voters’ ability to pass voter-proposed local special taxes by increasing percentage of votes needed to approve such ballot measures from a majority (over 50%) to two-thirds, beginning January 1, 2027. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that local government tax revenues will not go up as much in the future due to a higher vote threshold for certain taxes.

    A yes vote means

    Certain voter-proposed local special taxes would require two-thirds voter approval instead of a majority.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo57.3%6,257,179
    2. YesYes42.7%4,667,905
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 44Yes/No questionProposition 44Ballot question

    REQUIRES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS SPEND 90% OF REVENUE ON PROGRAM SERVICES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Imposes penalties on nonprofit Federally Qualified Health Centers (community clinics providing primary care to medically underserved areas and populations) that spend less than 90% of revenue on “program services” advancing their charitable purpose, including but not limited to patient services. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs in the low tens of millions of dollars per year, covered by fees.

    A yes vote means

    Certain private nonprofit health clinics would have to spend at least 90 percent of their revenue each year on providing health care services.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo82.1%8,946,122
    2. YesYes17.9%1,955,845
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 45Yes/No questionProposition 45Ballot question

    MODIFIES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Amends California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to expedite environmental review for certain projects (including most housing, transportation, water, and health projects) by setting deadlines to complete environmental review and resolve lawsuits challenging project approvals. Fiscal Impact: Initial costs for state and local governments, likely in the high tens of millions of dollars—potentially exceeding $100 million—annually, partly covered by fees. Uncertain, potentially more significant positive or negative longer-term fiscal effects.

    A yes vote means

    Certain public and private projects would be eligible for new environmental review and court challenge procedures with tighter time limits.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo56.1%6,103,353
    2. YesYes43.9%4,766,652
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State

Judicial retention 20

U.S. House 3

State Legislature 3

City offices 28

Camarillo

Moorpark

Ojai

Oxnard

Port Hueneme

  • Port Hueneme City Council Member5 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 5 win
    1. Laura Hernandez29.8%2,606
    2. Martha R. McQueen-Legohn23.4%2,048
    3. James Importante19.9%1,742
    4. Steven A. Gama18.1%1,585
    5. JKJulio Kollerbohm8.6%754
    Ventura County count18 of 18 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters

Santa Paula

Simi Valley

Thousand Oaks

Ventura (San Buenaventura)

City measures 2

Oxnard

  • Measure E – City of OxnardYes/No question
    Measure EBallot question

    CITY OF OXNARD EXTENSION OF MEASURE O SALES TAX. Shall the measure renewing an existing 1/2¢ sales tax used for maintaining City of Oxnard’s general governmental services, providing $20,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring oversight, audits, public spending disclosure, and all funds for Oxnard, be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote renews Oxnard's existing 1/2-cent general sales tax (Measure O), providing about $20 million annually for general city services until ended by voters, with oversight and audits.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters, 2026 Measures ↗
    1. NoNo53.4%17,929
    2. YesYes46.6%15,670
    Ventura County count171 of 171 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters

Simi Valley

  • Measure A – City of Simi ValleyYes/No question
    Measure ABallot question

    Shall the measure providing funding for general city services in Simi Valley, such as 9-1-1 emergency response, police and crime prevention, keeping streets, sidewalks, and infrastructure safe, clean and well-maintained, and senior citizen services by increasing the City of Simi Valley’s transient occupancy tax rate from 10% to 12% (paid only by hotel/short-term lodging guests), providing approximately $400,000 annually until ended by voters, with independent audits and all money locally controlled, be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote raises Simi Valley's transient occupancy (hotel/short-term lodging) tax from 10% to 12%, providing about $400,000 annually for general city services until ended by voters.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters, 2026 Measures ↗
    1. YesYes71.5%25,939
    2. NoNo28.5%10,348
    Ventura County count124 of 124 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters

School and college boards 22

County Superintendent of Schools

Fillmore Unified School District

Kern County

Las Virgenes Unified School District

  • Las Virgenes Unified School District4 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 4 win
    1. Angela Cutbill29.7%344
    2. Dallas Lawrence26.4%306
    3. Coral Edwardsen22.5%261
    4. SPSandra Pope21.4%248
    Ventura County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters

Moorpark Unified School District

Oxnard School District

Pleasant Valley School District

Rio School District

Santa Paula Unified School District

Simi Valley Unified School District

Ventura County

Ventura County Community College District

Ventura Unified School District

Special districts 12

Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency

Bell Canyon Community Services District

  • Bell Canyon Community Services District4 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 4 win
    1. CBCatherine Balin36.1%378
    2. MPMathew Perelman31.6%331
    3. VAVida Angiuli22.7%238
    4. ODOlga Damascus9.6%100
    Ventura County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters

Camarillo Health Care District

Conejo Recreation and Park District

  • Conejo Recreation and Park District Division 44 candidatesTop 1 of 4 wins
    1. ABAmy Buss45.0%3,934
    2. KNKerry Nelson36.1%3,155
    3. TOTymaeus Orfanos16.7%1,461
    4. DEDaniel Emerson Twedt2.3%198
    Ventura County count33 of 33 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters

Fillmore-Piru Memorial District

  • Fillmore-Piru Memorial District4 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 4 win
    1. EVErnest Villegas35.3%2,164
    2. WLWilliam L. Morris III28.7%1,760
    3. CMCarina M. Forsythe20.1%1,236
    4. DFDerek Fouarge15.9%976
    Ventura County count68 of 68 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters

Oxnard Harbor District

  • Oxnard Harbor District4 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 4 win
    1. JHJess Herrera34.1%23,085
    2. MAMary Anne Rooney28.3%19,171
    3. JTJason Thomas-Ma Hodge25.6%17,303
    4. HSHeather Schmidt11.9%8,078
    Ventura County count202 of 202 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters

Pleasant Valley Recreation and Park District

Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District

Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency

  • Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency Division 33 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 3 win
    1. MAMaria A. Gutzeit66.7%6
    2. LPLynne Plambeck33.3%3
    3. KPKenneth ''ken'' Petersen0.0%0
    Ventura County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters

United Water Conservation District

County, school and district measures 5

  • Measure B – Rio School DistrictYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure BBallot question

    To improve the quality of education and provide facility equity at all schools; make safety/ security improvements; upgrade/ modernize classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; replace leaky roofs; construct libraries and classrooms; and renovate plumbing and electrical systems, shall Rio Elementary School District’s measure authorizing $78,000,000 of bonds with legal rates, raising on average $4,500,000 annually, at approximately $28.21 per $100,000 assessed value be adopted, with annual audits, independent oversight, NO money for salaries, and all funds staying local?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Rio Elementary School District to issue $78 million in bonds, raising about $4.5 million annually at roughly $28.21 per $100,000 of assessed value, for school safety, classroom and facility upgrades.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters, 2026 Measures ↗
    1. YesYes66.3%4,800
    2. NoNo33.7%2,444
    Ventura County count67 of 67 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters
  • Measure C – Santa Paula Unified School DistrictYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure CBallot question

    To rebuild the gymnasium and build new community swimming pool facilities at local high schools; make safety and security improvements; upgrade, renovate, and modernize classrooms, restrooms, and school facilities, for vocational/career training and performing arts; shall Santa Paula Unified School District’s measure issuing $48,600,000 of bonds at legal rates, estimated annual levies of $27.98 per $100,000 assessed value (averaging $2,938,000), be adopted, with annual audits, independent citizens’ oversight, and NO money for teacher/administrator salaries?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Santa Paula Unified School District to issue $48.6 million in bonds, levying about $27.98 per $100,000 of assessed value (about $2.94 million a year), for a gym, pools, safety and classroom upgrades.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters, 2026 Measures ↗
    1. YesYes58.3%3,427
    2. NoNo41.7%2,450
    Ventura County count79 of 79 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters
  • Measure D – United Water Conservation DistrictYes/No questionNeeds two-thirds to pass
    Measure DBallot question

    United Water Conservation District 2026 Water Supply, Conservation and Water Quality Bond Measure. In order to construct and complete water supply, conservation, storage and water quality facilities required to meet customer demands, conserve water resources and comply with governmental requirements; shall United Water Conservation District’s facilities bond measure be approved authorizing $350,000,000 in bonds at legal interest rates, levying $24 per $100,000 of assessed value (approximately $23,000,000 annually on average) while bonds are outstanding with strict accountability requirements included?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes United Water Conservation District to issue $350 million in bonds, levying $24 per $100,000 of assessed value (about $23 million annually) while outstanding, for water supply, storage, conservation and quality facilities.

    Needed to pass

    Two-thirds

    Source: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters, 2026 Measures ↗
    1. YesYes69.2%51,698
    2. NoNo30.8%23,014
    Ventura County count515 of 515 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters
  • Measure H – Allan Hancock Joint Community College DistrictYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure HBallot question

    ALLAN HANCOCK JOINT COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT AFFORDABLE HIGHER EDUCATION. To repair/ upgrade Allan Hancock College’s aging classrooms, labs, career training facilities; construct classrooms, improve affordable education for students/veterans in science, math, nursing, welding, machining, skilled trades; offer local four-year degrees with Cal-Poly partnership; fix roofs, plumbing, electrical; and remove asbestos; shall Allan Hancock College’s measure authorizing $290 million in bonds at legal rates be adopted, levying $19 /$100,000 assessed value ($16 million annually while bonds are outstanding), with citizen oversight of locally controlled funding?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Allan Hancock Joint Community College District to issue $290 million in bonds, levying $19 per $100,000 of assessed value (about $16 million annually) while outstanding, for classroom, lab and career-training facilities.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters, 2026 Measures ↗
    1. YesYes50.0%13
    2. NoNo50.0%13
    Ventura County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters
  • Measure LV – Las Virgenes Unified School DistrictYes/No questionNeeds two-thirds to pass
    Measure LVBallot question

    To protect the quality of education in local schools and continue funding for math, science, technology, engineering, arts, skilled trades, and advanced programs that prepare students for success in college/ careers; attracting and retaining highly qualified teachers; and maintaining manageable class sizes, shall Las Virgenes Unified School District’s measure renewing the existing school parcel tax at the current $98 rate (no increase) for twelve years be adopted, with senior exemptions and all funds ($2,000,000 annually) benefiting local students?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote renews Las Virgenes Unified School District's existing $98 parcel tax for twelve years at no increase, with senior exemptions, raising about $2 million annually for academic programs and teachers.

    Needed to pass

    Two-thirds

    Source: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters, 2026 Measures ↗
    1. YesYes69.2%469
    2. NoNo30.8%209
    Ventura County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m. PTSource: Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters

About this information

County results come from the Ventura County Clerk-Recorder, Registrar of Voters. Statewide and districtwide totals come from the California Secretary of State. See the source links on each result; counts are semi-official and will change until certification, and no winners are called here.