Paper Trail Politics Election directory My Area

November 3, 2026 General Election · Election night returns

Yolo County election results

56,712ballots counted46.1% of 123,030 registered voters
~30,338ballots left to countcounty estimate
57contests on the ballotwith semi-official returns

Turnout as ballots are counted

Same point in the count (3 days after Election Day):

  • 202646.1%so far
Nov 2022 generalNov 2024 generalNov 2026
0%20%40%60%80%Election Day+7 days+14 days+21 days+28 days2022: 58.1% final2024: 80.0% final2026: 46.1%0%20%40%60%80%Election Day+14 days+28 days2022 58.1%2024 80.0%2026 46.1%
Show the data
YearCounty reportHours after polls closedBallots countedTurnout
20222022-12-01 12:20544.368,79458.13%
20242024-12-03 15:43667.794,50980.00%
20262026-11-06 16:5268.956,71246.10%

From the county’s results updates, timed from 8 p.m. on Election Day; earlier years are linear between updates.

D DemocraticR Republican* IncumbentLocal offices are nonpartisan.

Where available, statewide or districtwide totals from the California Secretary of State are shown first. Races that extend beyond this county offer “County only” for the county registrar’s count. Reports may update at different times.

Statewide offices 9

State propositions 14

  • California Proposition 1Yes/No questionProposition 1Ballot question

    AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR HOUSING AFFORDABILITY PROGRAMS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $11.25 billion in state general obligation bonds for housing affordability programs, including multifamily rental housing, mortgages for veterans, supportive housing, preservation of existing affordable housing, and downpayment assistance. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 25 years to repay the housing bond.

    A yes vote means

    The state could borrow $11.25 billion through general obligation bonds to support veterans and affordable housing programs.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes61.0%6,733,027
    2. NoNo39.0%4,296,574
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 2Yes/No questionProposition 2Ballot question

    INCREASES STATE’S RAINY DAY FUND. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Increases California's Rainy Day Fund, approved by voters in 2014, to provide funding for education, health care, public safety, and other essential services during economic downturns. Fiscal Impact: State budget reserves would be higher.

    A yes vote means

    State budget reserve rules would change so the Rainy Day Fund holds more money, and the state would make extra debt payments for longer.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes61.3%6,759,767
    2. NoNo38.7%4,260,447
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 3Yes/No questionProposition 3Ballot question

    PROVIDES PERMANENT FUNDING FOR SCHOOLS AND HEALTH CARE BY EXTENDING EXISTING TAX ON HIGH INCOMES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Makes permanent existing voter-approved tax rates for individuals earning over $371,000 (adjusted annually for inflation). Allocates tax revenues to public education. Fiscal Impact: Maintains $5 billion to $15 billion of annual state income tax revenue by making a temporary tax increase on high-income earners permanent instead of letting it expire in 2031.

    A yes vote means

    An income tax increase on high-income earners in place since 2012 would become permanent instead of expiring in 2031.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes60.6%6,733,849
    2. NoNo39.4%4,380,460
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 4Yes/No questionProposition 4Ballot question

    REPEALS PROHIBITION AGAINST PUBLIC FUNDING OF ELECTION CAMPAIGNS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Repeals prohibition on state and local governments offering public funding of candidate election campaigns. Public funding programs may not use funds earmarked for education, transportation, or public safety. Fiscal Impact: Ongoing costs to the state of a few hundred thousand dollars each year for the Fair Political Practices Commission to answer questions from state and local governments about public campaign finance programs.

    A yes vote means

    State and local governments could create public campaign financing programs for candidates, subject to limits on which public funds could be used and how.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo50.3%5,474,047
    2. YesYes49.7%5,406,205
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 5Yes/No questionProposition 5Ballot question

    CHANGES RECALL ELECTION PROCESS FOR STATEWIDE OFFICERS. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Under current law, voters elect replacement candidates at the same time as the recall election. This measure instead fills recall vacancies by subsequent special election or appointment. Fiscal Impact: Net fiscal effect unknown. In the event of a recall, savings or costs of millions of dollars to administer the election depending on the office recalled.

    A yes vote means

    Recall elections would no longer ask who should fill the vacancy; vacancies typically would be filled by special election or appointment.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes52.0%5,562,022
    2. NoNo48.0%5,134,433
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 37Yes/No questionProposition 37Ballot question

    CREATES LOAN PROGRAM FOR MIDDLE-INCOME BUYERS OF QUALIFIED NEW HOMES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $25 billion in bonds to offer eligible buyers fixed-rate mortgages for up to 17% of purchase price of a newly constructed home priced below about $1.5 million. Borrowers must be California residents, occupy the home, meet income limits, and pay at least 3% down. Bonds repaid by mortgage payments, not State. Fiscal Impact: No direct state or local costs.

    A yes vote means

    The state would create a homebuying assistance program funded by up to $25 billion in revenue bonds repaid by homeowners' loan payments.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes62.3%6,834,106
    2. NoNo37.7%4,132,590
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 38Yes/No questionProposition 38Ballot question

    AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR IMMUNOLOGY MEDICAL RESEARCH. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $8.4 billion in general obligation bonds for immunology and immunotherapy research, half to a single University of California-affiliated nonprofit medical research institute, half to research grants. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 20 years to repay the research bond, with some or all of the cost offset if the funded research generates revenue.

    A yes vote means

    The state could borrow $8.4 billion to support immunology and immunotherapy research by California research institutes and universities.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes54.2%5,963,079
    2. NoNo45.8%5,032,758
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 39Yes/No questionProposition 39Ballot question

    PROHIBITS CITIZENS FROM VOTING UNLESS THEY PRESENT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED IDENTIFICATION. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Invalidates mail ballots that do not have last four digits of designated government-issued identification number written on envelope. Prohibits in-person voting without presenting government-issued identification. Fiscal Impact: Costs of between tens of millions of dollars and low hundreds of millions of dollars each year to implement new voting requirements.

    A yes vote means

    Voters would be required to present additional identifying information, such as government-issued identification, to elections officials each time they vote.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo60.6%6,774,474
    2. YesYes39.4%4,407,227
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 40Yes/No questionProposition 40Ballot question

    IMPOSES ONE-TIME TAX ON CERTAIN TAXPAYERS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Imposes 5% tax on certain taxpayers with assets over $1 billion; revenue primarily for health care. Exempts revenues from constitutional requirements for school funding and spending limit. Fiscal Impact: Temporary revenue increase of tens of billions of dollars spread over several years from wealth tax on billionaires. Possible ongoing decrease of less than $1 billion per year in income tax revenue from billionaires.

    A yes vote means

    The state would collect a one-time tax from billionaires equal to 5 percent of their wealth.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo52.8%5,909,899
    2. YesYes47.2%5,288,424
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 41Yes/No questionProposition 41Ballot question

    PROHIBITS NEW STATE TAXES THAT EXCLUDE REVENUES FROM STATE SPENDING LIMIT. REQUIRES AUDITS FOR NEW STATE SPECIAL TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Nullifies state taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that exempt their revenues from voter-approved state spending limit. Requires pre-election and recurring audits of programs funded by new special taxes. Fiscal Impact: The net fiscal effect is unknown as it depends on future decisions by voters, the Legislature, and other policymakers.

    A yes vote means

    The State Auditor would review programs funded by new special taxes, and the state might not be able to exclude new special tax spending from its spending limit.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo54.9%6,035,499
    2. YesYes45.1%4,961,912
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 42Yes/No questionProposition 42Ballot question

    PROHIBITS NEW STATE PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES AND CERTAIN RETROACTIVE STATE TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Prohibits any new state tax (1) imposed on the ownership of personal property (all things people own other than real estate), or (2) that applies retroactively based on taxpayer’s past activities. Nullifies taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that conflict with this measure. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that tax revenues will not go up as much in the future.

    A yes vote means

    The state could not establish new taxes on the ownership of financial assets or other personal property.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes51.6%5,733,734
    2. NoNo48.4%5,371,123
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 43Yes/No questionProposition 43Ballot question

    LIMITS VOTERS’ ABILITY TO RAISE REVENUES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Limits voters’ ability to pass voter-proposed local special taxes by increasing percentage of votes needed to approve such ballot measures from a majority (over 50%) to two-thirds, beginning January 1, 2027. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that local government tax revenues will not go up as much in the future due to a higher vote threshold for certain taxes.

    A yes vote means

    Certain voter-proposed local special taxes would require two-thirds voter approval instead of a majority.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo57.3%6,257,179
    2. YesYes42.7%4,667,905
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 44Yes/No questionProposition 44Ballot question

    REQUIRES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS SPEND 90% OF REVENUE ON PROGRAM SERVICES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Imposes penalties on nonprofit Federally Qualified Health Centers (community clinics providing primary care to medically underserved areas and populations) that spend less than 90% of revenue on “program services” advancing their charitable purpose, including but not limited to patient services. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs in the low tens of millions of dollars per year, covered by fees.

    A yes vote means

    Certain private nonprofit health clinics would have to spend at least 90 percent of their revenue each year on providing health care services.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo82.1%8,946,122
    2. YesYes17.9%1,955,845
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 45Yes/No questionProposition 45Ballot question

    MODIFIES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Amends California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to expedite environmental review for certain projects (including most housing, transportation, water, and health projects) by setting deadlines to complete environmental review and resolve lawsuits challenging project approvals. Fiscal Impact: Initial costs for state and local governments, likely in the high tens of millions of dollars—potentially exceeding $100 million—annually, partly covered by fees. Uncertain, potentially more significant positive or negative longer-term fiscal effects.

    A yes vote means

    Certain public and private projects would be eligible for new environmental review and court challenge procedures with tighter time limits.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo56.1%6,103,353
    2. YesYes43.9%4,766,652
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State

Judicial retention 9

  • Retention of Administrative Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Presiding Justice Retention of Administrative Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Presiding Justice Retention of Administrative Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Administrative Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes79.6%33,529
    2. NoNo20.4%8,601
    Yolo County voters only64 of 64 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes77.8%32,210
    2. NoNo22.2%9,213
    Yolo County voters only64 of 64 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes75.1%31,064
    2. NoNo24.9%10,321
    Yolo County voters only64 of 64 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes77.0%31,795
    2. NoNo23.0%9,475
    Yolo County voters only64 of 64 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • Retention of Associate Justice Joshua Groban, California Supreme CourtYes/No questionAssociate Justice Joshua GrobanBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Joshua Groban be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Joshua Groban on the California Supreme Court for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes71.5%6,320,411
    2. NoNo28.5%2,517,810
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • Retention of Associate Justice Kelli M. Evans, California Supreme CourtYes/No questionAssociate Justice Kelli M. EvansBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Kelli M. Evans be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Kelli M. Evans on the California Supreme Court for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes72.5%6,401,321
    2. NoNo27.5%2,426,861
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes77.8%32,419
    2. NoNo22.2%9,241
    Yolo County voters only64 of 64 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes76.5%31,754
    2. NoNo23.5%9,778
    Yolo County voters only64 of 64 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes78.7%32,622
    2. NoNo21.3%8,834
    Yolo County voters only64 of 64 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

U.S. House 3

  • U.S. Representative District 42 candidates
    1. MTMike ThompsonD56.1%19,433
    2. EJEric JonesD43.9%15,179
    Yolo County voters only42 of 42 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • U.S. Representative District 62 candidates
    1. RPRichard PanD67.3%9,236
    2. KKKevin Kiley32.7%4,493
    Yolo County voters only10 of 10 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • U.S. Representative District 82 candidates
    1. JGJohn GaramendiD79.5%3,410
    2. RRRudy RecileR20.5%877
    Yolo County voters only12 of 12 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

State Legislature 1

County and Superior Court 1

  • County Supervisor District 32 candidates
    1. MVMayra Vega55.4%5,575
    2. DPDotty Pritchard44.6%4,482
    Yolo County count13 of 13 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

City offices 7

Davis

  • City of Davis Member, City Council District 11 candidate1 candidate for 1 seat
    1. JEJudy Ennis100.0%3,288
    Yolo County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • City of Davis Member, City Council District 41 candidate1 candidate for 1 seat
    1. GPGloria Partida100.0%3,126
    Yolo County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

West Sacramento

  • City of West Sacramento Member, City Council District 32 candidates
    1. PJPreston Jackson53.4%2,302
    2. DJDave Jans46.6%2,010
    Yolo County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • City of West Sacramento Member, City Council District 42 candidates
    1. VSVerna Sulpizio Hull54.5%2,311
    2. KBKathy Bailey45.5%1,932
    Yolo County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

Winters

  • City of Winters Member, City Council5 candidatesTop 1 of 5 wins
    1. KVKelli Villanueva27.5%1,432
    2. AVAlbert Vallecillo20.5%1,068
    3. CSCarol Scianna19.5%1,016
    4. RCRichard Casavecchia18.0%937
    5. DCDave Callison14.6%761
    Yolo County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

Woodland

  • City of Woodland Member, City Council District 12 candidates
    1. JOJesse Ortiz62.2%1,533
    2. GWGeorge Washington37.8%931
    Yolo County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • City of Woodland Member, City Council District 31 candidate1 candidate for 1 seat
    1. TGTania Garcia-Cadena100.0%1,523
    Yolo County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

City measures 3

Davis

  • Measure W – City of Davis, Willowgrove General Plan AmendmentYes/No question
    Measure WBallot question

    Shall Resolution No. 26-052 be adopted to amend the Davis General Plan to approve a residential development to include parks, trails, open space, and neighborhood retail areas, by changing the land use designations for the Willowgrove property from Agriculture to Urban Agriculture Transition Area, Park/Recreation, Neighborhood Greenbelt, Neighborhood Retail, and Residential Low, Medium, and High Density, and by establishing the Baseline Project Features?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote amends the Davis General Plan to allow the Willowgrove project on about 232 acres north of East Covell Boulevard: up to 1,250 homes (at least 250 deed-restricted affordable), a community park with an indoor gym, neighborhood retail and an agricultural buffer, with voter-approved baseline project features.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Yolo County Elections, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election – Measure W, City of Davis ↗
    1. YesYes73.4%14,166
    2. NoNo26.6%5,135
    Yolo County count18 of 18 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

Woodland

  • Measure Y – City of Woodland, Sales TaxYes/No question
    Measure YBallot question

    To rebuild roads and repair potholes, increase police and fire protection, recruit and retain public safety personnel, maintain parks and trails, and clean and maintain public spaces, shall the City of Woodland measure enacting a one cent transactions and use tax (sales tax) providing approximately 16 million dollars annually for general government services, until ended by voters, with all funds locally controlled and subject to independent financial audits and public spending disclosures, be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote enacts an additional one-cent (1%) sales tax in Woodland, a general tax expected to raise about $16 million a year for city services, in effect until repealed by voters.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Yolo County Elections, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election – Measure Y, City of Woodland Sales Tax Measure ↗
    1. YesYes64.2%8,413
    2. NoNo35.9%4,701
    Yolo County count11 of 11 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • Measure Z – City of Woodland, Sewer and Water Service Beyond Urban Limit LineYes/No question
    Measure ZBallot question

    Shall the measure amending the policy establishing the City’s Urban Limit Line to permit the extension of sewer, water, and recycled water facilities to serve existing commercial facilities located on parcels with a boundary that falls wholly or partially within one mile of the Urban Limit Line and in operation on or prior to November 3, 2026, be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote amends Woodland's voter-approved Urban Limit Line policy (2006 Measure A) to let the city extend sewer, water and recycled water service to existing commercial facilities within one mile of the line that were operating by November 3, 2026, case by case with council approval; new or residential development is not covered.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Yolo County Elections, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election – Measure Z, City of Woodland ↗
    1. YesYes68.1%8,660
    2. NoNo31.9%4,058
    Yolo County count11 of 11 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

School and college boards 6

Davis Joint Unified School District

  • Davis Joint Unified School District Governing Board Member Trustee Area 12 candidates
    1. CZColleen Zern85.0%3,668
    2. DJDorte Jensen15.1%650
    Yolo County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • Davis Joint Unified School District Governing Board Member Trustee Area 32 candidates
    1. JDJoe Dinunzio63.8%2,149
    2. KWKurt Wendlenner36.2%1,220
    Yolo County count4 of 4 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • Davis Joint Unified School District Governing Board Member Trustee Area 42 candidates
    1. EMElizabeth Moon88.1%3,994
    2. BBBeth Bourne11.9%540
    Yolo County count6 of 6 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

River Delta Unified School District

  • River Delta Unified School District Governing Board Member Trustee Area 52 candidates
    1. DMDaniel Merwin67.8%213
    2. ASAnnafiina Swenson32.2%101
    Yolo County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

Washington Unified School District

  • Washington Unified School District Governing Board Member Trustee Area 12 candidates
    1. VCVirginia Coffey59.3%1,070
    2. MGMaria Grijalva40.7%734
    Yolo County count6 of 6 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

Woodland Joint Unified School District

  • Woodland Joint Unified School District Governing Board Member Trustee Area 72 candidates
    1. EGEric Garber82.5%2,105
    2. CAChukwunedum (chuck) Amajioyi17.5%446
    Yolo County count8 of 8 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

Special districts 1

Knights Landing Community Services District

  • Knights Landing Community Services District Director Short Term2 candidates
    1. TGTeresa Guerrero79.0%117
    2. DGDonald Gonzales20.9%31
    Yolo County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

County, school and district measures 3

  • Measure B – Winters Joint Unified School District, School BondYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure BBallot question

    To improve the quality of education; repair or replace leaky roofs; modernize/renovate outdated classrooms, restrooms and school facilities; and replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; shall Winters Joint Unified School District’s measure authorizing $29,900,000 in bonds, at legal interest rates, and levying approximately $49 per $100,000 of assessed valuation (raising $1,600,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding, be adopted, with a Board-appointed citizens’ oversight committee and annual independent audits to assure proper expenditure of funds?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Winters Joint Unified School District to issue $29.9 million in bonds, levied at about $49 per $100,000 of assessed value (about $1.6 million a year), to repair and modernize school facilities.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Yolo County Elections, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election – Measure B, Winters Joint Unified School District ↗
    1. YesYes53.5%1,323
    2. NoNo46.5%1,150
    Yolo County count4 of 4 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • Measure H – Los Rios Community College District School Facilities Improvement District No. 1, College Facilities BondYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure HBallot question

    With funds that cannot be taken by the State, public disclosure of all spending, and no increase in tax rates, shall Los Rios Community College District's measure to prepare students, workers, veterans for jobs with affordable college and career training facilities; provide safe drinking water; and repair leaky roofs be adopted authorizing $1.1 billion in bonds with legal rates, average levies below $17 per $100,000 assessed valuation ($74,500,000 annually while outstanding), independent audits, oversight, and all funds staying local?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Los Rios Community College District's School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 to issue $1.1 billion in bonds, with average levies below $17 per $100,000 of assessed value (about $74.5 million annually), for college job-training facilities, safe drinking water and roof repairs.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Yolo County Elections, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election – Measure H, Los Rios Community College District, School Facilities Improvement District No. 1 ↗
    1. YesYes68.4%23,073
    2. NoNo31.6%10,639
    Yolo County count40 of 40 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office
  • Measure X – County of Yolo, Hotel Tax IncreaseYes/No question
    Measure XBallot question

    To fund local programs and services – such as maintaining health and human service program levels, enhancing public safety, and supporting emergency preparedness projects – shall the ordinance increasing Yolo County’s Transient Occupancy Tax, which is paid only by hotel/lodging/short-term rental guests in unincorporated areas (excluding cities), from 8% to 12% of the total rent charged, providing approximately an additional $250,000 annually until ended by voters, be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote raises the hotel/lodging tax (transient occupancy tax) in unincorporated Yolo County from 8% to 12% of rent, effective January 1, 2027, raising about $250,000 more a year for the county general fund; city lodging tax rates do not change.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Yolo County Elections, Nov. 3, 2026 General Election – Measure X, Yolo County Unincorporated Area Hotel Tax ↗
    1. YesYes60.2%31,622
    2. NoNo39.8%20,914
    Yolo County count64 of 64 precinctsUpdated November 6, 2026, 4:52 p.m. PTSource: Yolo County Elections Office

About this information

County results come from the Yolo County Elections Office. Statewide and districtwide totals come from the California Secretary of State. See the source links on each result; counts are semi-official and will change until certification, and no winners are called here.